Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Fuck, fuck, fuck: Reflexivity and fidelity in reporting swearwords in management research

Abstract : In this essay, I confront a problem I encountered at a recent academic conference wherein the words and sentiments of research respondents were unfortunately and unnecessarily silenced and edited-perhaps due to presenters' unfortunate and needless regard for the supposed impropriety of the respondents' language. I argue that such silencing and editing is not only unfaithful to our respondents; it is also unfaithful to our project as social scientists. I briefly review some of the literature on qualitative interviewing and the importance of positionality, relationality and reflexivity between the interviewer and the participant. I apply some of these prescriptions to the reporting of data in presentations and manuscripts. I then point out some examples of how rude or swearwords have been appropriately used in management and other journals and end with a plea that we remain true to the language and settings that are so important for our understanding of social and organizational life.
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02511055
Contributor : Isabelle Celet <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, March 18, 2020 - 2:32:41 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, March 19, 2020 - 1:33:24 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02511055, version 1

Collections

Citation

Bryant Ashley Hudson. Fuck, fuck, fuck: Reflexivity and fidelity in reporting swearwords in management research. M@n@gement, AIMS (Association internationale de management stratégique), 2019, 22 (3), pp.487-495. ⟨hal-02511055⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

12