Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals

Abstract : Does the rejection of pure proceduralism show that we should adopt Brettschneider’s value theory of democracy? The answer, this article suggests, is “no.” There are a potentially infinite number of incompatible ways to understand democracy, of which the value theory is, at best, only one. The article illustrates and substantiates its claims by looking at what the secret ballot shows us about the importance of privacy and democracy. Drawing on the reasons to reject Mill’s arguments for open voting, in a previous article by A. Lever, it argues that people’s claims to privacy have a constitutive, as well as an instrumental, importance to democratic government, which is best seen by attending to democracy as a practice, and not merely as a distinctive set of values.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [58 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02506497
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, March 12, 2020 - 1:27:10 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 1:59:53 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, June 13, 2020 - 2:50:41 PM

File

2015-lever-privacy-and-democra...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Annabelle Lever. Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2015, 11 (2), pp.164 - 183. ⟨hal-02506497⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

40

Files downloads

45