. Brian and K. A. Hugues, The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits, Evolutionary Genetics from Molecules to Morphology, pp.369-392, 2000.

B. Charlesworth, Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol.112, pp.1662-1669, 2015.

V. Llaurens, A. Whibley, and M. Joron, Genetic architecture and balancing selection: the life and death of differentiated variants, Mol. Ecol, vol.26, pp.2430-2448, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02324541

A. D. Gloss and N. K. Whiteman, Balancing selection: walking a tightrope, Curr. Biol, vol.26, pp.73-76, 2016.

T. Prout, How well does opposing selection maintain variation?, Evolutionary Genetics From Molecules to Morphology, pp.157-181, 2000.

H. Levene, Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available, Am. Nat, vol.87, pp.331-333, 1953.

P. W. Hedrick, Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: the age of genomics, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst, vol.37, pp.67-93, 2006.

M. J. Wittmann, A. O. Bergland, M. W. Feldman, P. S. Schmidt, and D. A. Petrov, Seasonally fluctuating selection can maintain polymorphism at many loci via segregation lift, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol.114, pp.9932-9941, 2017.

N. J. Barson, Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon, Nature, vol.528, p.405, 2015.

K. Grieshop and G. Arnqvist, Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness, PLoS Biol, vol.16, p.2006810, 2018.

D. E. Pearse, Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout, Nat. Ecol. Evol, vol.3, pp.1731-1742, 2019.

S. C. Stearns, Trade-offs in life-history evolution, Funct. Ecol, vol.3, pp.259-268, 1989.

S. E. Johnston, Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation, Nature, vol.502, pp.93-95, 2013.

M. R. Rose, Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation, Heredity, vol.48, p.63, 1982.

M. R. Rose, Life history evolution with antagonistic pleiotropy and overlapping generations, Theor. Popul. Biol, vol.28, pp.342-358, 1985.

P. W. Hedrick, Antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic polymorphism: a perspective, Heredity, vol.82, pp.126-133, 1999.

M. R. Rose, P. M. Service, and E. W. Hutchinson, Three approaches to tradeoffs in life-history evolution, Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution, pp.91-105, 1987.

J. W. Curtsinger, P. M. Service, and T. Prout, Antagonistic pleiotropy, reversal of dominance, and genetic polymorphism, Am. Nat, vol.144, pp.210-228, 1994.

F. Zajitschek and T. Connallon, Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness, Evolution, vol.72, pp.1306-1316, 2018.

K. Brown and J. Kelly, Antagonistic pleiotropy can maintain fitness variation in annual plants, J. Evol. Biol, vol.31, pp.46-56, 2018.

A. Tellier, L. M. Villaréal, and T. Giraud, Antagonistic pleiotropy may help population-level selection in maintaining genetic polymorphism for transmission rate in a model phytopathogenic fungus, Heredity, vol.98, p.45, 2006.

T. Connallon and S. F. Chenoweth, Dominance reversals and the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness, PLoS Biol, vol.17, p.3000118, 2019.

T. J. Dooren, Protected polymorphism and evolutionary stability in pleiotropic models with trait-specific dominance, Evolution, vol.60, pp.1991-2003, 2006.

A. Troth, J. R. Puzey, R. S. Kim, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly, Selective trade-offs maintain alleles underpinning complex trait variation in plants, Science, vol.361, pp.475-478, 2018.

J. P. Mojica, Y. W. Lee, J. H. Willis, and J. K. Kelly, Spatially and temporally varying selection on intrapopulation quantitative trait loci for a life history trade-off in Mimulus guttatus, Mol. Ecol, vol.21, pp.3718-3728, 2012.

C. Mérot, Intercontinental karyotype-environment parallelism supports a role for a chromosomal inversion in local adaptation in a seaweed fly, Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci, vol.285, p.20180519, 2018.

T. Day, C. Dawe, T. Dobson, and P. Hillier, A chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Scandinavian populations of the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Hereditas, vol.99, pp.135-145, 1983.

R. Butlin, P. Collins, S. Skevington, and T. Day, Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.48, pp.45-55, 1982.

A. A. Hoffmann and L. H. Rieseberg, Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation?, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst, vol.39, pp.21-42, 2008.

R. Faria, K. Johannesson, R. K. Butlin, and A. M. Westram, Evolving inversions, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.34, pp.239-248, 2019.

M. Wellenreuther and L. Bernatchez, Eco-evolutionary genomics of chromosomal inversions, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.33, pp.427-440, 2018.

R. Butlin and T. Day, Genic and karyotypic selection on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.54, pp.267-274, 1985.

R. Butlin, P. Collins, and T. Day, The effect of larval density on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.52, pp.415-423, 1984.

R. Butlin and T. Day, Environmental correlates of inversion frequencies in natural populations of seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida), Heredity, vol.62, pp.223-232, 1989.

R. Butlin and T. Day, Adult size, longevity and fecundity in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.54, pp.107-110, 1985.

A. S. Gilburn and T. H. Day, Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and the ?? chromosomal inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci, vol.257, pp.303-309, 1994.

R. Butlin, I. Read, and T. Day, The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.49, pp.51-62, 1982.

R. Butlin and T. Day, The effect of larval competition on development time and adult size in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Oecologia, vol.63, pp.122-127, 1984.

A. S. Gilburn, C. S. Crean, and T. H. Day, Sexual selection in natural populations of seaweed flies: variation in the offspring fitness of females carrying different inversion karyotypes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, vol.263, pp.249-256, 1996.

T. Day, T. Dobson, P. Hillier, D. Parkin, and B. Clarke, Different rates of development associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.44, p.321, 1980.

T. H. Day, S. P. Foster, and G. Engelhard, Mating behavior in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida), J. Insect Behav, vol.3, pp.105-120, 1990.

A. S. Gilburn and T. H. Day, Female mating behaviour, sexual selection and chromosome I inversion karyotype in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity, vol.82, pp.276-281, 1999.

T. Dobson, Studies on the biology of the kelp-fly Coelopa in Great Britain, J. Nat. Hist, vol.8, pp.155-177, 1974.

D. Roff and D. Fairbairn, The evolution of trade-offs: where are we?, J. Evol. Biol, vol.20, pp.433-447, 2007.

D. Roff, Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence, J. Evol. Biol, vol.13, pp.434-445, 2000.

J. G. Kingsolver and S. E. Diamond, Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?, Am. Nat, vol.177, pp.346-357, 2011.

Y. Teuschl, C. Reim, and W. Blanckenhorn, Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies, J. Evol. Biol, vol.20, pp.87-103, 2007.

L. E. Kruuk, A new explanation for unexpected evolution in body size, PLoS Biol, vol.15, p.2001832, 2017.

T. Bonnet, P. Wandeler, G. Camenisch, and E. Postma, Bigger is fitter? Quantitative genetic decomposition of selection reveals an adaptive evolutionary decline of body mass in a wild rodent population, PLoS Biol, vol.15, p.1002592, 2017.

A. Fournier-level, Paths to selection on life history loci in different natural environments across the native range of Arabidopsis thaliana, Mol. Ecol, vol.22, pp.3552-3566, 2013.

E. Berdan, H. Rosenquist, K. Larson, and M. Wellenreuther, Inversion frequencies and phenotypic effects are modulated by the environment: insights from a reciprocal transplant study in Coelopa frigida, Evol. Ecol, vol.32, pp.683-698, 2018.

D. A. Edward and A. S. Gilburn, Male-specific genotype by environment interactions influence viability selection acting on a sexually selected inversion system in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Evolution, vol.67, pp.295-302, 2013.

C. Sgro and A. Hoffmann, Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation, Heredity, vol.93, p.241, 2004.

C. K. Cornwallis, R. Dean, and T. Pizzari, Sex-specific patterns of aging in sexual ornaments and gametes, Am. Nat, vol.184, pp.66-78, 2014.

T. Connallon and A. G. Clark, A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation, Genetics, vol.190, pp.1477-1489, 2012.

L. Poul and Y. , Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a butterfly mimicry supergene, Nat. Commun, vol.5, p.5644, 2014.

J. P. Kenney-hunt and J. M. Cheverud, Differential dominance of pleiotropic loci for mouse skeletal traits, Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol, vol.63, pp.1845-1851, 2009.

J. Wang, A Y-like social chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants, Nature, vol.493, pp.664-668, 2013.

M. Kirkpatrick, How and why chromosome inversions evolve, PLoS Biol, vol.8, p.1000501, 2010.

E. L. Berdan, A. Blanckaert, R. K. Butlin, and C. Bank, Muller's Ratchet and the long-term fate of chromosomal inversions, 2019.

M. Wellenreuther, C. Mérot, E. Berdan, and L. Bernatchez, Going beyond SNPs: the role of structural genomic variants in adaptive evolution and species diversification, Mol. Ecol, vol.28, pp.1203-1209, 2019.

A. A. Hoffmann, C. M. Sgrò, and A. R. Weeks, Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms and adaptation, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.19, pp.482-488, 2004.

T. Schwander, R. Libbrecht, and L. Keller, Supergenes and complex phenotypes, Curr. Biol, vol.24, pp.288-294, 2014.

M. Kirkpatrick, The evolution of genome structure by natural and sexual selection, J. Hered, vol.108, pp.3-11, 2017.

M. Chouteau, V. Llaurens, F. Piron-prunier, and M. Joron, Polymorphism at a mimicry supergene maintained by opposing frequency-dependent selection pressures, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol.114, pp.8325-8329, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02324532

C. Küpper, A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff, Nat. Genet, vol.48, pp.79-83, 2016.

M. R. Christie, G. G. Mcnickle, R. A. French, and M. S. Blouin, Life history variation is maintained by fitness trade-offs and negative frequency-dependent selection, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol.115, pp.4441-4446, 2018.

D. Bates, M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker, lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, R. Package Version, vol.1, pp.1-23, 2014.

A. Kuznetsova, P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. Christensen, lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models, J. Stat. Softw, vol.82, 2017.

Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol, vol.57, pp.289-300, 1995.

. R-core-team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018.

V. Grimm, The ODD protocol: a review and first update, Ecol. Model, vol.221, pp.2760-2768, 2010.

N. E. Hamilton and M. Ferry, ggtern: ternary diagrams using ggplot2, J. Stat. Softw, vol.87, pp.1-17, 2018.