P. C. Stern, Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change A framework for psychological contributions, Am Psychol, vol.66, pp.303-317, 2011.

L. Bromham, R. Dinnage, and X. Hua, Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success, Nature [Internet], vol.534, issue.7609, pp.684-691, 2016.

H. Ledford, How to solve the world's biggest problems, Nature, vol.525, p.308, 2015.

M. Szell, Y. Ma, and R. Sinatra, A Nobel opportunity for interdisciplinarity, Nat Phys [Internet], vol.14, issue.11, pp.1075-1083, 2018.

E. Leahey, C. M. Beckman, and T. L. Stanko, Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists' research, Adm Sci Q, vol.62, pp.105-144, 2017.

G. Allport, The nature of prejudice, 1954.

C. Y. Chiu, L. Kwan, and S. Liou, Culturally motivated challenges to innovations in integrative research: Theory and solutions, Soc Issues Policy Rev, vol.7, issue.1, pp.149-72, 2013.

S. Guimond, M. Dambrun, N. Michinov, and S. Duarte, Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions, J Pers Soc Psychol, vol.84, pp.697-721, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00114562

A. Joshi and H. Roh, The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review, Acad Manag J, vol.52, pp.599-627, 2009.

P. M. Banerjee and C. Y. Chiu, Professional biculturalism enculturation training: A new per-spective on managing R&D and marketing interface, Current Topics in Management. New Brunswick, pp.145-59, 2008.

V. Yzerbyt, S. Demoulin, . Intergroup, and . Relations, Handbook of Social Psychology, pp.1024-83, 2010.

H. Tajfel, M. G. Billig, R. F. Bundy, and C. Flament, Social categorization and intergroup behaviour, Interdisciplinary contact PLOS ONE, vol.1, pp.149-77, 1971.

Y. Dunham, Mere membership, Trends Cogn Sci [Internet], vol.22, issue.9, pp.780-93, 2018.

J. Sidanius and F. Pratto, Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, 1999.

H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, The social psychology of intergroup relations, pp.33-47, 1979.

B. A. Bettencourt, K. Charlton, N. Dorr, and D. L. Hume, Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability, Psychol Bull, vol.127, pp.520-562, 2001.

J. A. Oldmeadow and S. T. Fiske, Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high-and low-status groups. Gr Process Intergr Relations, vol.13, pp.425-469, 2010.

S. Guimond, S. Dif, and A. Aupy, Social identity, relative group status and intergroup attitudes: When favourable outcomes change intergroup relations . . .for the worse, Eur J Soc Psychol, vol.32, issue.6, pp.739-60, 2002.

L. Hedges, How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?: The empirical cumulativeness of research, Am Psychol, vol.42, pp.443-55, 1987.

N. W. Storer, The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations, Bull Med Libr Assoc, vol.55, pp.75-84, 1967.

S. Cole, The hierarchy of the sciences?, Am J Sociol, vol.89, pp.111-150, 1983.

R. Seidl and R. Barthel, Linking scientific disciplines: Hydrology and social sciences, J Hydrol, vol.550, pp.441-52, 2017.

A. Viseu, Integration of social science into research is crucial, Nat News, vol.525, p.291, 2015.

T. Hargreaves and J. Burgess, Pathways to interdisciplinarity: A technical report exploring collaborative interdisciplinary working in the Transition Pathways consortium, Work Pap-Cent Soc Econ Res Glob Environ, vol.44, pp.1-46, 2010.

C. K. Kirby, P. Jaimes, A. R. Lorenz-reaves, and J. C. Libarkin, Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science, PLoS One

T. F. Pettigrew and L. R. Tropp, A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory, J Pers Soc Psychol, vol.90, issue.5, pp.751-83, 2006.

L. Vezzali, D. Giovannini, and D. Capozza, Longitudinal effects of contact on intergroup relations: The role of majority and minority group membership and intergroup emotions, J Community Appl Soc Psychol, vol.20, pp.462-79, 2010.

M. Hewstone, Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact, J Soc Issues, vol.71, pp.417-455, 2015.

J. F. Dovidio, A. Love, F. Schellhaas, and M. Hewstone, Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Gr Process Intergr Relations, vol.20, pp.606-626, 2017.

E. L. Paluck, S. Green, and D. Green, The contact hypothesis re-evaluated

,

B. J. Cosley, S. Mccoy, and S. Gardner, Collaborative voice: Examining the role of voice in interdisciiplinary collaboration, Int J Organ Theory Behav, vol.17, pp.139-62, 2014.

T. A. Heberlein, Improving interdisciplinary research: Integrating the social and natural sciences, Soc Nat Resour, vol.1, issue.1, pp.5-16, 1988.

F. J. Van-rijnsoever and L. K. Hessels, Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy, vol.40, pp.463-72, 2011.

A. Voci and M. Hewstone, Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience, Gr Process Intergr Relations, vol.6, pp.37-54, 2003.

R. Wö-lfer and M. Hewstone, Beyond the dyadic perspective: 10 reasons for using social network analysis in intergroup contact research, Br J Soc Psychol, vol.56, pp.609-626, 2017.

M. Latapy, C. Magnien, N. Vecchio, and . Del, Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks, Soc Networks, vol.30, pp.31-48, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01146080

M. Kivelä, A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J. P. Gleeson, Y. Moreno et al., Multilayer networks, Interdisciplinary contact PLOS ONE, vol.2, pp.203-71, 2014.

T. Tam, M. Hewstone, J. Kenworthy, and E. Cairns, Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland, Personal Soc Psychol Bull, vol.35, issue.1, pp.45-59, 2009.

R. Wö-lfer, E. Jaspers, D. Blaylock, C. Wigoder, J. Hughes et al., Studying positive and negative direct and extended contact: Complementing self-reports with social network analysis, Personal Soc Psychol Bull, vol.43, pp.1566-81, 2017.

S. Guimond, R. J. Crisp, P. De-oliveira, R. Kamiejski, N. Kteily et al., Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts, J Pers Soc Psychol, vol.104, pp.941-58, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01473271

M. E. Tankard and E. L. Paluck, Norm perception as a vehicle for social change, Soc Issues Policy Rev, vol.10, pp.181-211, 2016.

E. Green, E. P. Visintin, O. Sarrasin, and M. Hewstone, When integration policies shape the impact of intergroup contact on threat perceptions: a multilevel study across 20 European countries, J Ethn Migr Stud, pp.1-18, 2019.

S. Bonzi, Trends in research productivity among senior faculty, Inf Process Manag, vol.28, pp.111-131, 1992.

B. Stvilia, C. C. Hinnant, K. Schindler, A. Worrall, G. Burnett et al., Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab, Interdisciplinary contact PLOS ONE, vol.62, issue.2, pp.270-83, 2011.