, M agent is lower than the m.a. position of the M agent on the M worldview

, M agent has a small margin(h) which almost does not decrease in width after the terrorist attack

, M and non-M agents have common acceptable positions which should remain after the terrorist attack. These acceptable positions are, at least partly based on overlap of the margins (l) of the M and the non-M agents since these margins are not changed by the terrorist attack. Thus, the larger the margins(l) of the M and non-M agents, the higher the probability to observe an increase of attitudes over M agents

, M agent attitude toward the M agent attitude is higher when the M agent's margin(h) is larger, and when the distance between the m.a.positions of the non-M and M agents is smaller; in other words, this means M agents should differentiate strongly from the terrorist's cultural identity and that non-M agent should be supportive of the M worldview (i.e. the m.a.position of the non-M agent is positive

J. Greenberg, T. Pyszczynski, and S. Solomon, The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory, Springer Series in Social Psychology, 1986.

J. Greenberg, J. Arndt, P. Van-lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and H. E. Editors, Handbook of theories of social psychology, vol.1, pp.398-415, 2013.

T. Pyszczynski, J. Greenberg, and S. Solomon, A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory, Psychological Review, vol.106, issue.4, pp.835-880, 1999.

J. Greenberg and S. Kosloff, Terror Management Theory: Implications for Understanding Prejudice, Stereotyping, Intergroup Conflict, and Political Attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol.2, pp.1881-94, 2008.

V. Jvd, D. M. Houston, D. Abrams, and M. Vasiljevic, London Bombings Affected Liberals' Moral Foundations and Prejudice, Psychological Science, vol.27, issue.2, pp.169-77, 2005.

M. Motyl, J. Hart, T. Pyszczynski, D. Weise, M. Maxfield et al., Subtle priming of shared human experiences eliminates threat-induced negativity toward Arabs, immigrants, and peace-making, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.47, issue.6, pp.1179-84, 2011.

A. Nugier, E. Roebroeck, N. Anier, E. P. Kleinlogel, A. Chatard et al., The Psychological Effects of Terrorism are Moderated by Cultural Worldviews, International Review of Social Psychology, vol.29, issue.1, 2016.

R. Axelrod, The dissemination of culture a model with local convergence and global polarization, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol.41, issue.2, pp.203-229, 1997.

C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, Statistical physics of social dynamics, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol.81, issue.2, pp.591-646, 2009.

M. Schaller and C. S. Crandall, The Psychological Foundations of Culture, vol.384, 2004.

A. Radillo-díaz, L. A. Pé-rez, D. Castillo-mussot, and M. , Axelrod models of social influence with cultural repulsion, Physical Review E, vol.80, issue.6, p.66107, 2009.

A. Flache, . Mä-s-m, T. Feliciani, E. Chattoe-brown, G. Deffuant et al., Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers, Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, vol.20, issue.4, p.31, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02606532

A. Flache and M. W. Macy, Local Convergence and Global Diversity: From Interpersonal to Social Influence, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol.55, issue.6, pp.970-95, 2011.

G. Deffuant, S. Huet, and T. Carletti, Leviathan model: vanity generating general distrust or absolute dominance. INTERACTIONS 2011-Mathematical Sciences to the proof of Human & Social Sciences, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02596549

F. Paris,

N. Friedkin and E. Johnsen, Social influence and opinions, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.15, issue.3-4, pp.193-205, 1990.

S. Guimond, The effects of integration policies on intergroup relations and well-being in France and in Québec, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), 2016.

M. Sherif and C. I. Hovland, Social Judgment. Assimilation and contrast effects. Communication and attitude change, 1961.

R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, and C. Haugtvedt, Ego-involvement and Persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherif's contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change, Social judgment and intergroup relations: Essays in honor of Muzafer Sherif, pp.147-75, 1992.

A. H. Eagly and K. Telaak, Width of the latitude of acceptance as a determinant of attitude change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.23, issue.3, pp.388-97, 1972.

T. Pyszczynski, S. Solomon, and J. Greenberg, Chapter One-Thirty Years of Terror Management Theory: From Genesis to Revelation, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol.52, pp.1-70, 2015.

H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, Psychology of intergroup relations, pp.7-24, 1986.

J. C. Turner and K. J. Reynolds, Handbook of theories of social psychology. 2. London: Sage, pp.399-417, 2013.

J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE. 1995;0-7803-2768-3/95:1942-8 Resisting hostility generated by terror: An agent-based study

. Plos-one-|, , vol.17, p.17, 2019.