A burden for the boys: Evidence of stereotype threat in boys' reading performance

Pascal Pansu (1) , Isabelle Régner (2) , Sylvain Max (1) , Pascale Colé (2) , John B. Nezlek , Pascal Huguet (2)

1 LaRAC - Laboratoire de Recherche sur les Apprentissages en Contexte
2 LPC - Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive

There is ample evidence that Stereotype Threat (ST) contributes to gender differences favoring males on standardized math tests; however, whether ST also contributes to gender differences favoring females in reading remains unanswered. This is surprising as the gender gap in reading is three times bigger than the gender gap in math (OECD, 2014). In this study, we examined whether ST may explain gender differences favoring schoolgirls in reading, assuming that boys are negatively stereotyped in this domain. Eighty students (3rd grade) took a reading test while being assigned to either a threat or a reduced-threat condition (test presented as diagnostic of reading abilities versus as a game, respectively). Boys underperformed girls in the threat condition, whereas they outperformed girls in the reduced-threat condition. Consistent with ST theory, this pattern was obtained only among highly-identified students. These findings offer another explanatimi for the well-known gender gap favoring girls in reading. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Domaines: Psychologie

Pascal Pansu, Isabelle Régner, Sylvain Max, Pascale Colé, John B. Nezlek, et al.. A burden for the boys: Evidence of stereotype threat in boys' reading performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2016, 65, pp.26-30. ⟨10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.008⟩. ⟨hal-01432308⟩