S. Airiau, E. Bonzon, and U. Endriss, Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks: Characterisation and complexity, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.60, pp.149-177, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01617015

J. Kenneth and . Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 1951.

E. Awad, R. Booth, and F. Tohmé-&-iyad-rahwan, Judgement Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.27, issue.1, pp.227-259, 2015.

T. Bench-capon, Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, pp.429-448, 2003.

T. Bench-capon, S. Doutre, &. Paul, and E. Dunne, Audiences in Argumentatio Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.1, pp.42-71, 2007.

F. Brandt, V. Conitzer, U. Endriss, J. Lang, &. Ariel et al., Handbook of Computational Social Choice, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02119942

W. Chen-&-ulle and . Endriss, Preservation of Semantic Properties in Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, Artificial Intelligence, vol.269, pp.27-48, 2019.

S. Coste-marquis, C. Devred, S. Konieczny, and M. Marquis, On The Merging of Dung's Argumentation Systems, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, pp.730-753, 2007.

J. Delobelle, A. Haret, S. Konieczny, and J. Mailly, Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, Proceedings of the 2016 Knowledge Representation (KR), pp.33-42, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01936995

J. Delobelle, S. Konieczny-&-srdjan, and . Vesic, On The Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks: Operators and Postulates, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.28, issue.7, pp.1671-1699, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01936989

D. Phan-minh, On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.

E. Paul, A. Dunne, P. Hunter, S. Mcburney, and . Parsons-&-michael-wooldridge, Weighted Argument Systems: Basic Definitions, Algorithms, and Complexity Results, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.2, pp.457-486, 2011.

E. Paul, P. Dunne, and . Marquis-&-michael-wooldridge, Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results, Proceedings of the Coference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp.129-140, 2012.

P. E. Dunne and P. Marquis-&-michael-wooldridge, Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results, Computational Models of Argument, pp.129-140, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00867076

U. Endriss, ;. Brandt, V. Conitzer, . Endriss, and . Lang, Judgment aggregation, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01501681

, Handbook of Computational Social Choice

U. Endriss and &. Grandi, Binary Aggregation by Selection of the Most Representative Voter, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp.668-674, 2014.

U. Endriss and &. Grandi, Collective Rationality in Graph Aggregation, 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp.291-296, 2014.

U. Endriss and &. Grandi, Graph Aggregation, Artificial Intelligence, vol.245, pp.86-114, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02089268

P. Everaere, S. Konieczny, and &. Marquis, An Introduction to Belief Merging and its Links with Judgment Aggregation, Trends in Computational Social Choice, pp.123-143, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01643087

X. Fan and &. Toni, On Computing Explanations in Argumentation, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp.1496-1502, 2015.

A. Gibbard, Manipulation of Voting Schemes: a General Result, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.587-601, 1973.

D. Grossi and &. Pigozzi, Judgment Aggregation: a Primer, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol.8, issue.2, pp.1-151, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01497079

S. Kaci, &. Leendert-van-der, and T. , Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.48, issue.3, pp.730-751, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800647

G. Lisowski, Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Master's thesis, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02279403

G. Lisowski, S. Doutre-&-umberto, and . Grandi, Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Audiences in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks, Proceedings of International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2018), pp.48-59, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02279403

P. Toni, A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation, Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pp.285-297, 2008.

T. Miller, Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Social Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, vol.267, pp.1-38, 2019.

S. Modgil, Reasoning About Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.9, pp.901-934, 2009.

C. Perelman, The New Rhetoric, Pragmatics of Natural Languages, pp.145-149, 1971.

F. Pu, J. Luo, Y. Zhang-&-guiming, and . Luo, Social Welfare Semantics for Value-Based Argumentation Framework, Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge, pp.76-88, 2013.

&. Iyad-rahwan and . Tohmé, Collective Argument Evaluation as Judgement Aggregation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp.417-424, 2010.

. Mark-allen-satterthwaite, Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, issue.2, pp.187-217, 1975.