Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Subsumption and Incompatibility between Principles in Ranking-based Argumentation

Philippe Besnard 1 Victor David 2 Sylvie Doutre 1 Dominique Longin 1
1 IRIT-LILaC - Logique, Interaction, Langue et Calcul
IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
2 IRIT-ADRIA - Argumentation, Décision, Raisonnement, Incertitude et Apprentissage
IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
Abstract : Ranking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments in an abstract argumentation framework, by providing a ranking on arguments. This paper aims at going towards a generalization of the construction of such semantics, by investigating subsumption and incompatibility cases that may arise when principles that may enter into their composition are combined.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [22 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02365625
Contributor : Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (oatao) <>
Submitted on : Friday, November 15, 2019 - 2:36:44 PM
Last modification on : Friday, November 27, 2020 - 7:06:01 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, February 16, 2020 - 4:53:42 PM

File

besnard_22093.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02365625, version 1
  • OATAO : 22093

Citation

Philippe Besnard, Victor David, Sylvie Doutre, Dominique Longin. Subsumption and Incompatibility between Principles in Ranking-based Argumentation. 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2017), Nov 2017, Boston, MA, United States. pp.853-859. ⟨hal-02365625⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

61

Files downloads

141