, and Engineering Sciences, vol.119, p.173, 1928.
, Physical Review, vol.102, p.1464, 1956.
, Fusion Engineering and Design, vol.88, p.1, 2013.
, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol.79, pp.2-109, 2008.
, Nuclear Fusion, vol.49, p.45006, 2009.
High Voltage Vacuum Insulation: Basic Concepts and Technological Practice, 1995. ,
, Journal of Applied Physics, vol.38, p.880, 1967.
, Physica, vol.61, p.259, 1972.
, Vacuum, vol.18, p.379, 1968.
, Vacuum, vol.46, p.907, 1995.
, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol.21, p.960, 1988.
, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B (Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures), vol.16, p.2871, 1998.
, , 2014.
, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, vol.17, p.103502, 2014.
, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol.34, p.61208, 2016.
, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, vol.121, p.626, 1928.
, Phys. Rev, vol.90, p.515, 1953.
, App. Phys. Lett, vol.59, p.1644, 1991.
, Solid-State Electronics, vol.45, p.809, 2001.
, App. Phys. Lett, vol.89, p.113122, 2006.
, Nanotechnology, vol.26, p.242001, 2015.
, Ultramicroscopy, vol.159, p.162, 2015.
, Journal of Applied Physics, vol.104, p.14310, 2008.
, Phys. Rev. Lett, vol.95, p.177602, 2005.
, Phys. Rev. Lett, vol.85, p.1750, 2000.
, Phys. Rev. Lett, vol.87, p.177601, 2001.
, Surface Science, vol.516, p.265, 2002.
, Materials Science and Engineering A, vol.327, p.1, 2002.
, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, vol.16, p.4685, 2004.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.72, p.35449, 2005.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.68, p.235401, 2003.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.85, p.115427, 2012.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.80, p.115422, 2009.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.65, p.85405, 2002.
, Nanotechnology, vol.16, p.125, 2005.
, Nanotechnology, vol.18, p.475706, 2007.
, J. Appl. Phys, vol.122, p.215105, 2017.
, J. App. Phys, vol.125, p.25107, 2019.
, J. App. Phys, vol.120, p.85105, 2016.
, Surface Science, vol.645, p.56, 2016.
, Physical Review B, vol.47, p.558, 1993.
, Physical Review B, vol.49, p.14251, 1994.
, Computational Materials Science, vol.6, p.15, 1996.
, Physical Review B, vol.54, p.11169, 1996.
, Physical Review B, vol.50, p.17953, 1994.
, Physical Review B, vol.59, p.1758, 1999.
, Physical Review Letters, vol.77, p.3865, 1996.
, Physical Review Letters, vol.78, p.1396, 1997.
, Physical Review B, vol.40, p.3616, 1989.
, Physical Review B, vol.13, p.5188, 1976.
, Nanotechnology, vol.19, p.235402, 2008.
, Physics of Plasmas, vol.19, p.33107, 2012.
, Applied Surface Science, vol.215, p.113, 2003.
, Proceedings of the Young Researchers in Vacuum Micro/Nano Electronics (VMNE-YR) conference, 2016.
, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys, vol.51, p.225203, 2018.
, Computational Materials Science, vol.128, p.15, 2017.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.58, p.7544, 1998.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.66, p.75405, 2002.
, Phys. Rev. Lett, vol.88, p.156802, 2002.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.79, p.195425, 2009.
, Field emission in vacuum microelectronics, 2005.
, Phys. Rev. Applied, vol.6, p.34013, 2016.
, MRS Bulletin, vol.42, p.505, 2017.
, Phys. Rev. Lett, vol.121, p.56802, 2018.
, the local total current density J(x, y) rescaled by F 2 to allow for a direct comparison with FN plots
, Squares: FN plot for the local current density J(x = 0.5, y = 0.5) (W location), from DFT calculations. Triangles: FN plot for the local current density J(x = 0, y = 0) (C location), from DFT calculations. Circles: FN plot for the averaged current density, from DFT calculations. Also shown are the FN plots for the Fowler-Nordheim models obtained with the work functions 4.23 eV (dashed line) and 4.79 eV (dashed-dotted line). These values are those of the local work functions for the W and C locations, respectively, FIG. 5: Fowler-Nordheim plots for local and averaged current densities in the 1ML case
, 3) for spherical harmonics with z components (p z , d z 2 , d xz , d yz ), centered on the topmost tungsten atom and truncated to be confined inside a sphere of radius 1.455Å. Results for d xz and d yz are degenerate. Bottom: state current density J m as a function of the energy of the state m, Top: Projected local density of states, vol.20, p.40
,
, A frame has been added (second from the top) to show projected local density of states associated to the adsorbed C atom, Same as fig. 7, but for the 1ML case