Mid-Holocene climate change over China: model–data discrepancy

Yating Lin (1) , Gilles Ramstein (2, 3) , Haibin Wu (1, 4, 5) , Raj Rani (2) , Pascale Braconnot (2, 6) , Masa Kageyama (2, 3) , Qin Li (1) , Yunli Luo (7) , Ran Zhang (8) , Zhengtang Guo (1, 4, 5)

1 IGG - Institute of Geology and Geophysics [Beijing]
2 LSCE - Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette]
3 CLIM - Modélisation du climat
4 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment
5 UCAS - University of Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing]
6 MERMAID - Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics
7 IB-CAS - Institute of Botany [Beijing]
8 IAP - Institute of Atmospheric Physics [Beijing]

The mid-Holocene period (MH) has long been an ideal target for the validation of general circulation model (GCM) results against reconstructions gathered in global datasets. These studies aim to test GCM sensitivity, mainly to seasonal changes induced by the orbital parameters (lon-gitude of the perihelion). Despite widespread agreement between model results and data on the MH climate, some important differences still exist. There is no consensus on the continental size (the area of the temperature anomaly) of the MH thermal climate response, which makes regional quantitative reconstruction critical to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the MH climate patterns. Here, we compare the annual and seasonal outputs from the most recent Paleo-climate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (PMIP3) models with an updated synthesis of climate reconstruction over China, including, for the first time, a seasonal cycle of temperature and precipitation. Our results indicate that the main discrepancies between model and data for the MH climate are the annual and winter mean temperature. A warmer-than-present climate condition is derived from pollen data for both annual mean temperature (∼ 0.7 K on average) and winter mean temperature (∼ 1 K on average), while most of the models provide both colder-than-present annual and winter mean temperature and a relatively warmer summer, showing a linear response driven by the seasonal forcing. By conducting simulations in BIOME4 and CESM, we show that surface processes are the key factors creating the uncertainties between models and data. These results pinpoint the crucial importance of including the non-linear responses of the surface water and energy balance to vegetation changes.

Domaines: Climatologie

Yating Lin, Gilles Ramstein, Haibin Wu, Raj Rani, Pascale Braconnot, et al.. Mid-Holocene climate change over China: model–data discrepancy. Climate of the Past, 2019, 15 (4), pp.1223-1249. ⟨10.5194/cp-15-1223-2019⟩. ⟨hal-02328216⟩