R. A. Brooks, Flesh and machines. How robots will change us, 2002.

T. Kanda, T. Hirano, D. Eaton, and H. Ishiguro, Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial, Human-Computer Interact, vol.19, pp.61-84, 2004.

,

N. Riether, F. Hegel, B. Wrede, and G. Horstmann, Social facilitation with social robots?, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction -HRI '12, pp.41-59, 2012.

J. S. Herberg, S. Feller, I. Yengin, and M. Saerbeck, Robot watchfulness hinders learning performance, Proceedings -IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.153-160, 2015.

C. Edwards, A. Edwards, P. R. Spence, and D. Westerman, Initial Interaction Expectations with Robots: Testing the Human-To-Human Interaction Script, Commun Stud, vol.67, pp.227-238, 2016.

. Triplett, The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition, American J Psychol, vol.9, pp.507-533, 1898.

C. F. Bond and L. J. Titus, Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies, Psychol Bull, vol.94, pp.265-292, 1983.

R. G. Geen and J. J. Gange, Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research, Psychol Bull, vol.84, pp.1267-1288, 1977.

B. Guerin, Social facilitation and social monitoring: A test of three models, Br J Soc Psychol, vol.22, pp.203-214, 1983.

R. B. Zajonc, Social facilitation, Science, vol.149, pp.269-274, 1965.

,

C. L. Hull, A behavior system: an introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism, 1952.

S. R. Mcfall, J. P. Jamieson, and S. G. Harkins, Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship, J Pers Soc Psychol, vol.96, pp.135-154, 2009.

,

R. S. Baron, Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems, Adv Exp Soc Psychol, vol.19, pp.60211-60218, 1986.

C. Belletier and V. Camos, Does the experimenter presence affect working memory?, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci, 2018.

C. Belletier, K. Davranche, I. S. Tellier, F. Dumas, F. Vidal et al., Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention, Psychon Bull Rev, vol.22, pp.1410-1416, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01384036

,

P. Huguet, M. P. Galvaing, J. M. Monteil, and F. Dumas, Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation, J Pers Soc Psychol, vol.77, pp.1011-1024, 1999.

A. Normand, C. A. Bouquet, and J. C. Croizet, Does evaluative pressure make you less or more distractible? Role of top-down attentional control over response selection, J Exp Psychol Gen, vol.143, pp.1097-1111, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02097710

N. Haslam and S. Loughnan, Dehumanization and infrahumanization, Annu. Rev. Psychol, vol.65, pp.399-423, 2014.

P. Wühr and L. Huestegge, The impact of social presence on voluntary and involuntary control of spatial attention, Soc Cogn, vol.28, pp.145-160, 2010.

,

P. Huguet, I. Barbet, C. Belletier, J. M. Monteil, and J. Fagot, Cognitive control under social influence in baboons, J Exp Psychol Gen, vol.143, pp.2067-2073, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432471

,

E. Monfardini, J. Redouté, F. Hadj-bouziane, C. Hynaux, J. Fradin et al., Others' Sheer presence boosts brain activity in the attention (but not the motivation) network, Cereb Cortex, vol.26, pp.2427-2439, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432312

,

J. R. Stroop, Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions, J Exp Psychol, vol.18, pp.643-662, 1935.

C. Macleod, Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review, Psychol. Bull, vol.109, pp.163-203, 1991.

M. Augustinova and L. Ferrand, Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm, Curr Dir Psychol Sci, vol.23, pp.343-348, 2014.

,

P. Huguet, F. Dumas, and J. M. Monteil, Competing for a desired reward in the stroop task: When attentional control is unconscious but effective versus conscious but ineffective, Can. J. Exp. Psychol, vol.58, pp.153-167, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01441332

M. Augustinova and L. Ferrand, The influence of mere social presence on Stroop interference: New evidence from the semantically-based Stroop task, J Exp Soc Psychol, vol.48, pp.1213-1216, 2012.

K. C. Klauer, J. Herfordt, and A. Voss, Social presence effects on the Stroop task: Boundary conditions and an alternative account, J Exp Soc Psychol, vol.44, pp.469-476, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00563506

,

D. Sharma, R. Booth, R. Brown, and P. Huguet, Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task, Psychon Bull Rev, vol.17, pp.52-58, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01440438

,

M. Augustinova, L. Silvert, L. Ferrand, P. M. Llorca, and V. Flaudias, Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01717519

, Psychon Bull Rev, vol.22, pp.543-549

M. Augustinova, L. Silvert, N. Spatola, and L. Ferrand, Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short responsestimulus intervals, Acta Psychol, vol.189, pp.54-62, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01648948

,

M. Augustinova, D. Clarys, N. Spatola, and L. Ferrand, Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference, Psychon Bull Rev, vol.25, pp.767-774, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01720348

,

B. A. Parris, Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context, Front Psychol, vol.5, p.1182, 2014.

B. G. Tabachnik and L. S. Fidell, Using multivariate statistics, 2007.

F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang, and A. Buchner, G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, Behav Res Methods, vol.39, pp.175-191, 2007.

L. B. Christensen, R. B. Johnson, and L. A. Turner, Research Methods, Design, and Analysis, 2010.

B. R. Duffy, Anthropomorphism and the social robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, pp.177-190, 2003.

B. Hanington and B. Martin, Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions, 2012.

T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and K. Kato, Measurement of anxiety toward robots, Proceedings -IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.372-377, 2006.

M. Augustinova and L. Ferrand, Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: Evidence from the semantically based Stroop task, Psychon Bull Rev, vol.19, pp.521-527, 2012.

,

N. Spatola, C. Belletier, A. Normand, P. Chausse, S. Monceau et al., Not as bad as it seems: When the presence of a threatening humanoid robot improves human performance, Sci Robot, vol.3, p.5843, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01867906

,

C. Nass and Y. (. Moon, Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, J Soc Issues, vol.56, pp.81-103, 2000.

I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and F. W. Hesse, Collaboration scripts -A conceptual analysis, Educ Psychol Rev, vol.18, pp.159-185, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190642

B. Reeves and C. Nass, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, 1996.

E. Sallnäs, K. Rassmus-gröhn, and C. Sjöström, Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol.7, pp.461-476, 2000.

C. Breazeal, Social interactions in HRI: The robot view, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev, vol.34, pp.181-186, 2004.

T. Chaminade, D. W. Franklin, E. Oztop, and G. Cheng, Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artificial motion, Proceedings of 2005 4th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, pp.96-101, 2005.

A. P. Saygin, T. Chaminade, H. Ishiguro, J. Driver, and C. Frith, The thing that should not be: Predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, vol.7, pp.413-422, 2012.

,

, Nicolas Spatola is postdoctoral researcher at the Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et

(. Cognitive, . Lapsco, . Umr-6024, and F. Cnrs, His research examines how the development of social robotics and Artificial Intelligence may impact individuals' cognition and the society. Also, his studies include how Human Robot attention processes are modulated by situational and social factors such as the presence of others

F. Ferrand, He has been the dean of an engineering school in Computer Science from 2012 to 2017, He is currently a Full Professor in Computer Science at the Clermont, 2000.

, His research interests include image processing, machine and deep learning, and n-dimensional data analysis. He has coordinated, and participated in, a number of national and European projects to this end. He has published or co-published more than 40 peer-reviewed papers in the field of image and data analysis

, ) and a Master of Experimental Psychology and Psychophysiology (1990) from Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 6024, France. Dr. Ferrand received his Ph.D. in Cognitive Psychology from the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, vol.5, 1991.

P. Huguet, FR CNRS 3512) at Aix-Marseille University, and is now head of the Social and Cognitive Psychology Lab (UMR CNRS 6024) at University Clermont Auvergne. His research focuses on the social regulation of cognitive functioning (especially attention and memory), with a special interest for social presence effects in human and nonhuman primates, Behaviour and Cognition Institute, 1992.