E. Schneider, X. Irastorza, M. Bakhuys-roozeboom, and I. Houtman, OSH in figures: occupational safety and health in the transport sectorAn overview, Eur. Agency for Saf. and Health at Work, 2010.

A. Parent-thirion, G. Vermeylen, G. Van-houten, M. Lyly-yrjninen, I. Biletta et al., Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, 2012.

, Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses RequiringDays Away from Work, 2015.

L. Fritzsche, J. Wegge, M. Schmauder, M. Kliegel, and K. Schmidt, Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing, Ergonomics, vol.57, issue.2, pp.148-161, 2014.

A. Luttmann, M. Jäger, B. Griefahn, G. Caffier, and F. Liebers, Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace, WHO, 2003.

J. K. Sluiter, K. M. Rest, and M. H. Frings-dresen, Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, pp.1-102, 2001.

J. R. Grieve and C. R. Dickerson, Overhead work: Identification of evidence-based exposure guidelines, Occup. Ergon, vol.8, issue.1, pp.53-66, 2008.

M. P. De-looze, T. Bosch, F. Krause, K. S. Stadler, and L. W. Osullivan, Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load, Ergonomics, vol.59, issue.5, pp.671-681, 2016.

N. Sylla, V. Bonnet, F. Colledani, and P. Fraisse, Ergonomic contribution of able exoskeleton in automotive industry, Int. J. Ind. Ergon, vol.44, issue.4, pp.475-481, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01111273

S. Spada, L. Ghibaudo, S. Gilotta, L. Gastaldi, and M. P. Cavatorta, Analysis of exoskeleton introduction in industrial reality: Main issues and eaws risk assessment, Int. Conf. Appl. Human Factors and Ergon, pp.236-244, 2017.

T. Butler and D. Wisner, Exoskeleton technology: Making workers safer and more productive, ASSE Professional Development Conf. and Expo, 2017.

J. C. Gillette and M. L. Stephenson, Emg assessment of a shoulder support exoskeleton during on-site job tasks, 41st Annu. Meeting of Am. Soc. of Biomech, 2017.

K. Huysamen, T. Bosch, M. De-looze, K. S. Stadler, E. Graf et al., Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.148-155, 2018.

B. M. Otten, R. Weidner, and A. Argubi-wollesen, Evaluation of a novel active exoskeleton for tasks at or above head level, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett, vol.3, issue.3, pp.2408-2415, 2018.

S. Kim, M. A. Nussbaum, M. I. Esfahani, M. M. Alemi, S. Alabdulkarim et al., Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part iexpected effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.315-322, 2018.

S. Kim, M. A. Nussbaum, M. I. Esfahani, M. M. Alemi, B. Jia et al., Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part ii-unexpected effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.323-330, 2018.

L. Van-engelhoven, N. Poon, H. Kazerooni, A. Barr, D. Rempel et al., Evaluation of an adjustable support shoulder exoskeleton on static and dynamic overhead tasks, Human Factors and Ergono. Soc. Int. Annu. Meeting, 2018.

A. Moyon, E. Poirson, and J. Petiot, Experimental study of the physical impact of a passive exoskeleton on manual sanding operations, Procedia CIRP, vol.70, pp.284-289, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01988710

A. Voilqué, J. Masood, J. Fauroux, L. Sabourin, and O. Guezet, Industrial exoskeleton technology: Classification, structural analysis, and structural complexity indicator, Wearable Robotics Ass. Conf. IEEE, 2019, pp.13-20

J. Theurel, K. Desbrosses, T. Roux, and A. Savescu, Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks, Appl. Ergon, vol.67, pp.211-217, 2018.

E. B. Weston, M. Alizadeh, G. G. Knapik, X. Wang, and W. S. Marras, Biomechanical evaluation of exoskeleton use on loading of the lumbar spine, Appl. Ergon, vol.68, pp.101-108, 2018.

E. Rashedi, S. Kim, M. A. Nussbaum, and M. J. Agnew, Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work, Ergonomics, vol.57, issue.12, pp.1864-1874, 2014.

A. J. Young and D. P. Ferris, State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, vol.25, issue.2, pp.171-182, 2017.

C. Nabeshima, K. Ayusawa, C. Hochberg, and E. Yoshida, Standard performance test of wearable robots for lumbar support, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett, vol.3, issue.3, pp.2182-2189, 2018.

J. Bornmann, A. Kurzweg, and K. Heinrich, Tragbare assistenzsysteme in der automobilmontage: Forschung und entwicklung innovativer orthetischer systeme zur physischen unterstützung whrend der Uberkopfarbeit, 2016.

. Volkswagenag, Produktion der Zukunft: Exoskelette unterstützen Mitarbeiter am Standort Bratislava, 2018.

S. Ivaldi, L. Fritzsche, J. Babi?, F. Stulp, M. Damsgaard et al., Anticipatory models of human movements and dynamics: the roadmap of the andy project, Digital Hum. Model. Symp, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01539731

S. Baltrusch, J. Van-dieën, S. Bruijn, A. Koopman, C. Van-bennekom et al., The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking, Ergonomics, pp.1-14, 2019.

T. Bosch, J. Van-eck, K. Knitel, and M. De-looze, The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work, Appl. Ergon, vol.54, pp.212-217, 2016.

B. H. Whitfield, P. A. Costigan, J. M. Stevenson, and C. L. Smallman, Effect of an on-body ergonomic aid on oxygen consumption during a repetitive lifting task, nt. J. Ind. Ergon, vol.44, issue.1, pp.39-44, 2014.

N. Sylla, V. Bonnet, G. Venture, N. Armande, and P. Fraisse, Assessing neuromuscular mechanisms in human-exoskeleton interaction, p.36
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01111277

, Annu. Int. Conf. of IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc, pp.1210-1213, 2014.

D. Ndahimana and E. Kim, Measurement methods for physical activity and energy expenditure: a review, Clinical nutrition research, vol.6, issue.2, pp.68-80, 2017.

T. Flash and N. Hogan, The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model, J. Neurosci, vol.5, issue.7, pp.1688-1703, 1985.

B. G. Borgs, Perceived exertion and pain scales, Human Kinetics, 1998.

S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, Adv. Psychol, vol.52, pp.139-183, 1988.

V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decis. Sci, vol.39, issue.2, pp.273-315, 2008.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS quarterly, pp.425-478, 2003.

A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller, An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale, Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol.24, issue.6, pp.574-594, 2008.

H. J. Hermens, B. Freriks, R. Merletti, D. Stegeman, J. Blok et al., European recommendations for surface electromyography, Roessingh Res. and Dev, vol.8, issue.2, 1999.

L. Mcatamney and E. N. Corlett, Rula: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Appl. Ergon, vol.24, issue.2, pp.91-99, 1993.

E. Comau and . Mate, , 2019.

P. Maurice, L. Allienne, A. Malaisé, and S. Ivaldi, Ethical and social considerations for the introduction of human-centered technologies at work, IEEE Workshop on Adv. Rob. and Social Impacts, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01826487

S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, Advances in psychology, vol.52, pp.139-183, 1988.

V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decision sciences, vol.39, issue.2, pp.273-315, 2008.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS quarterly, pp.425-478, 2003.

, Overall, how did you feel performing the task with and without the exoskeleton? ? Difference between with and without? ? General feeling without: difficult? Physically fatiguing? ? General feeling with the exoskeleton: more/less effort doing the task? Physically and mentally? ? General feeling: was its

, exoskeleton? ? Sensation of general comfort / discomfort / neutral? ? How does the contact between the exoskeleton and your body make you feel? ? Impression that your body is constrained? ? How about the idea of being "augmented

, How did you feel during the first trials? ? Sensation of general comfort / discomfort? Any change in time?

, ? How were your movements? Were some movements specifically easier/harder than without the exoskeleton? ? Did you have the impression that you were constrained? ? Did you have the impression that you were making better movements with time? ? Did you feel safe? Safer or less than at the beginning? ? Any fears, concerns? ? Overall, was the sensation of wearing and using the exoskeleton becoming better or worse?

, to the exoskeleton? ? How about the level of assistance of the exoskeleton: correct/not enough/too much? ? Did you feel that you had learned how to use it? ? Did you feel the exoskeleton was specifically helpful/annoying during specific movements or parts of the task? ? Did you feel safe? Safer or less than at the beginning? ? Any fears, concerns? ? Overall, was the sensation of wearing and using the exoskeleton better or worse than the initial one (the first impression

. Overall, of the experiment? ? Do you feel the support of the exoskeleton a relief for you or not? ? Is it comfortable to wear? Comfortable to use? ? Does it allow you to move freely or do you feel constrained? ? Overall, do you feel positive/neutral/negative towards the system? ? Would you use it again for overhead work?

, What are, in your opinion, the elements to improve in using the exoskeleton? ? Design ? Weight ? Temperature ? Safety TABLE V: List of questions used to orient the semi