OSH in figures: occupational safety and health in the transport sectorAn overview, Eur. Agency for Saf. and Health at Work, 2010. ,
, Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, 2012.
, Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses RequiringDays Away from Work, 2015.
Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing, Ergonomics, vol.57, issue.2, pp.148-161, 2014. ,
, Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace, WHO, 2003.
Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, pp.1-102, 2001. ,
Overhead work: Identification of evidence-based exposure guidelines, Occup. Ergon, vol.8, issue.1, pp.53-66, 2008. ,
Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load, Ergonomics, vol.59, issue.5, pp.671-681, 2016. ,
Ergonomic contribution of able exoskeleton in automotive industry, Int. J. Ind. Ergon, vol.44, issue.4, pp.475-481, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01111273
Analysis of exoskeleton introduction in industrial reality: Main issues and eaws risk assessment, Int. Conf. Appl. Human Factors and Ergon, pp.236-244, 2017. ,
Exoskeleton technology: Making workers safer and more productive, ASSE Professional Development Conf. and Expo, 2017. ,
Emg assessment of a shoulder support exoskeleton during on-site job tasks, 41st Annu. Meeting of Am. Soc. of Biomech, 2017. ,
Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.148-155, 2018. ,
Evaluation of a novel active exoskeleton for tasks at or above head level, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett, vol.3, issue.3, pp.2408-2415, 2018. ,
Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part iexpected effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.315-322, 2018. ,
Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part ii-unexpected effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading, Appl. Ergon, vol.70, pp.323-330, 2018. ,
Evaluation of an adjustable support shoulder exoskeleton on static and dynamic overhead tasks, Human Factors and Ergono. Soc. Int. Annu. Meeting, 2018. ,
Experimental study of the physical impact of a passive exoskeleton on manual sanding operations, Procedia CIRP, vol.70, pp.284-289, 2018. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01988710
Industrial exoskeleton technology: Classification, structural analysis, and structural complexity indicator, Wearable Robotics Ass. Conf. IEEE, 2019, pp.13-20 ,
Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks, Appl. Ergon, vol.67, pp.211-217, 2018. ,
Biomechanical evaluation of exoskeleton use on loading of the lumbar spine, Appl. Ergon, vol.68, pp.101-108, 2018. ,
Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work, Ergonomics, vol.57, issue.12, pp.1864-1874, 2014. ,
State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, vol.25, issue.2, pp.171-182, 2017. ,
Standard performance test of wearable robots for lumbar support, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett, vol.3, issue.3, pp.2182-2189, 2018. ,
Tragbare assistenzsysteme in der automobilmontage: Forschung und entwicklung innovativer orthetischer systeme zur physischen unterstützung whrend der Uberkopfarbeit, 2016. ,
Produktion der Zukunft: Exoskelette unterstützen Mitarbeiter am Standort Bratislava, 2018. ,
Anticipatory models of human movements and dynamics: the roadmap of the andy project, Digital Hum. Model. Symp, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01539731
The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking, Ergonomics, pp.1-14, 2019. ,
The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work, Appl. Ergon, vol.54, pp.212-217, 2016. ,
Effect of an on-body ergonomic aid on oxygen consumption during a repetitive lifting task, nt. J. Ind. Ergon, vol.44, issue.1, pp.39-44, 2014. ,
Assessing neuromuscular mechanisms in human-exoskeleton interaction, p.36 ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01111277
, Annu. Int. Conf. of IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc, pp.1210-1213, 2014.
Measurement methods for physical activity and energy expenditure: a review, Clinical nutrition research, vol.6, issue.2, pp.68-80, 2017. ,
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model, J. Neurosci, vol.5, issue.7, pp.1688-1703, 1985. ,
Perceived exertion and pain scales, Human Kinetics, 1998. ,
Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, Adv. Psychol, vol.52, pp.139-183, 1988. ,
Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decis. Sci, vol.39, issue.2, pp.273-315, 2008. ,
User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS quarterly, pp.425-478, 2003. ,
An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale, Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol.24, issue.6, pp.574-594, 2008. ,
European recommendations for surface electromyography, Roessingh Res. and Dev, vol.8, issue.2, 1999. ,
Rula: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Appl. Ergon, vol.24, issue.2, pp.91-99, 1993. ,
, , 2019.
Ethical and social considerations for the introduction of human-centered technologies at work, IEEE Workshop on Adv. Rob. and Social Impacts, 2018. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01826487
Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, Advances in psychology, vol.52, pp.139-183, 1988. ,
Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decision sciences, vol.39, issue.2, pp.273-315, 2008. ,
User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS quarterly, pp.425-478, 2003. ,
, Overall, how did you feel performing the task with and without the exoskeleton? ? Difference between with and without? ? General feeling without: difficult? Physically fatiguing? ? General feeling with the exoskeleton: more/less effort doing the task? Physically and mentally? ? General feeling: was its
, exoskeleton? ? Sensation of general comfort / discomfort / neutral? ? How does the contact between the exoskeleton and your body make you feel? ? Impression that your body is constrained? ? How about the idea of being "augmented
, How did you feel during the first trials? ? Sensation of general comfort / discomfort? Any change in time?
, ? How were your movements? Were some movements specifically easier/harder than without the exoskeleton? ? Did you have the impression that you were constrained? ? Did you have the impression that you were making better movements with time? ? Did you feel safe? Safer or less than at the beginning? ? Any fears, concerns? ? Overall, was the sensation of wearing and using the exoskeleton becoming better or worse?
, to the exoskeleton? ? How about the level of assistance of the exoskeleton: correct/not enough/too much? ? Did you feel that you had learned how to use it? ? Did you feel the exoskeleton was specifically helpful/annoying during specific movements or parts of the task? ? Did you feel safe? Safer or less than at the beginning? ? Any fears, concerns? ? Overall, was the sensation of wearing and using the exoskeleton better or worse than the initial one (the first impression
of the experiment? ? Do you feel the support of the exoskeleton a relief for you or not? ? Is it comfortable to wear? Comfortable to use? ? Does it allow you to move freely or do you feel constrained? ? Overall, do you feel positive/neutral/negative towards the system? ? Would you use it again for overhead work? ,
, What are, in your opinion, the elements to improve in using the exoskeleton? ? Design ? Weight ? Temperature ? Safety TABLE V: List of questions used to orient the semi