J. A. Baum and . Singh, Evolutionary dynamics of organizations, 1994.

T. J. Bouchard, Genetic influence on human psychological traits: A survey, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.13, issue.4, pp.148-151, 2004.

L. M. Camarinha-matos, Collaborative Business Ecosystems and Virtual Enterprises: IFIP TC5/WG5. 5 Third Working Conference on Infrastructures for Virtual Enterprises (PRO-VE'02, vol.85, 2002.

F. E. Clements, Plant Succession, vol.242, 1916.

W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, Metaphors and Theory Building in Organization Theory: What Determines the Impact of a Metaphor on Theory?, Cornelisen J.P. & kafouros M, vol.35, issue.1, pp.365-379, 1990.

J. P. Cornelissen, Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory, Academy of Management Review, vol.30, pp.751-764, 2005.

J. P. Cornelissen and M. Kafouros, The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations, Organization studies, vol.29, issue.7, pp.957-978, 2008.

J. P. Cornelissen and M. Kafouros, Metaphors and theory building in organization theory: what determines the impact of a metaphor on theory, British Journal of Management, vol.19, issue.4, pp.365-379, 2008.

M. Cusumano, Staying Power: Six enduring principles for managing strategy and innovation in an uncertain world, 2010.

C. Darwin, The Origin of Species; And, the Descent of Man, 1859.

C. Dhanaraj and A. Parkhe, Orchestrating innovation networks, Academy of management review, vol.31, pp.659-669, 2006.

P. R. Ehrlich and P. H. Raven, Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution, Evolution, vol.18, issue.4, pp.586-608, 1964.

C. S. Elton, The nature and origin of soil-polygons in Spitsbergen, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, vol.83, issue.1-5, p.163, 1927.

D. S. Evans and R. Schmalensee, Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms, 2016.

F. Fréry, Les Ecosystèmes d'affaires : un malentendu fertile, Communication a la Table Ronde sur «les Ecosystèmes d'affaires: intérêts et limites dans le champ du management stratégique», XIXe Conference de I'AIMS, 2010.

R. Garud and P. R. Nayyar, Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer, Strategic Management Journal, vol.15, pp.365-85, 1994.

A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, Platform Leaders. MIT Sloan management review, Special issue Top 10 Lessons on Strategy, pp.68-75, 2008.

A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.31, issue.3, pp.417-433, 2014.

D. Gentner and D. R. Gentner, F10wing water or teeming erowds: Mental models of electricity, Mental models, pp.99-129, 1983.

J. Gerring, What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences, Polity, vol.31, issue.3, pp.357-393, 1999.

S. J. Gould, La structure de la théorie de l'évolution, 2006.

D. Grant and C. Oswick, Metaphor and organizations, 1996.

P. R. Guimarães, P. Jordano, and J. N. Thompson, Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks, Ecology letters, vol.14, pp.877-885, 2011.

M. T. Hannan and J. Freeman, The population ecology of organizations, American journal of sociology, vol.82, issue.5, pp.929-964, 1977.

M. T. Hannan and J. Freeman, Organizational ecology, 1993.

C. E. Helfat and R. S. Raubitschek, Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems, Research Policy, vol.47, issue.8, pp.1391-1399, 2018.

J. M. Hite and W. S. Hesterly, The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm, Strategic management journal, vol.22, issue.3, pp.275-286, 2001.

G. E. Hutchinson, The ecological theater and the evolutionary play, 1942.

M. Iansiti and R. Levien, The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability, Modes of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, vol.6, pp.1-27, 1991.

H. Isaac, Plateforme: pour une approche systémique. Cahiers de la Chaire Intelligence économique et stratégie des organisations (IESO), 2017.

T. Isckia and D. Lescop, Understanding Business Ecosystems: How Firms Succeed in the New World of Convergence, pp.97-111, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01264680

T. Isckia and D. Lescop, Strategizing in platform-based ecosystems: leveraging core processes for continuous innovation, Communications & Strategies, issue.99, p.91, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01264745

T. Isckia, M. De-reuver, and D. Lescop, Toward an evolutionary framework for platformbased ecosystem analysis (No. hal-01992440), 2018.

M. G. Jacobides, C. Cennamo, and A. Gawer, Towards a theory of ecosystems, Strategic Management Journal, vol.39, pp.2255-2276, 2018.

D. H. Janzen, When is it coevolution? Evolution, vol.34, p.612, 1980.

P. Kale and H. Singh, Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success, Strategic Management Journal, vol.28, pp.981-1000, 2007.

S. E. Khilji, T. Mroczkowski, and B. Bernstein, From invention to innovation: toward developing an integrated innovation model for biotech firms', Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.23, pp.528-568, 2006.

M. Kimura, The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, 1983.

G. Koenig, Business ecosystems revisited. in Gratacap A. et al. Understanding Business Ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of convergence? p, p.250, 2013.

M. P. Koza and A. Y. Lewin, The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization science, vol.9, pp.255-264, 1998.

J. B. Lamarck and . Savy, Philosophie zoologique, vol.1, 1809.

A. Y. Lewin and H. W. Volberda, Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization science, vol.10, pp.519-534, 1999.

A. Y. Lewin and H. Volberda, The future of organization studies: Beyond the selection adaptation debate, The Oxford handbook of organization theory, pp.568-595, 2003.

A. Y. Lewin, C. P. Long, and T. N. Carroll, The coevolution of new organizational forms, Organization Science, vol.10, issue.5, pp.535-550, 1999.

U. Lichtenthaler and E. Lichtenthaler, A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity, Journal of management studies, vol.46, pp.1315-1338, 2009.

T. Loilier and M. Malherbe, Le développement des compétences écosystémiques, Revue française de gestion, vol.3, pp.89-105, 2012.

G. Lorenzoni and A. Lipparini, The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal, vol.20, pp.317-355, 1999.

F. Malerba, Innovation and the evolution of industries, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol.16, pp.3-23, 2006.

M. Manikkam, R. Tracey, C. Guerrero-bosagna, and M. K. Skinner, Dioxin (TCDD) induces epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease and sperm epimutations, PloS one, vol.7, p.46249, 2012.

S. L. Mcgaughey, Strategic interventions in intellectual asset flows, Academy of Management Review, vol.27, pp.248-74, 2002.

B. Mckelvey, Perspective-Quasi-natural organization science, Organization science, vol.8, pp.351-380, 1997.

B. Mckelvey, Managing coevolutionary dynamics, 18th EGOS Conference, pp.1-21, 2002.

G. Mendel, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden, Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brunn, vol.4, p.44, 1866.

E. Mitleton-kelly and L. K. Davy, The concept of 'co-evolution'and its application in the social sciences: a review of the literature, Co-evolution of Intelligent Socio-technical Systems, pp.43-57, 2013.

J. F. Moore, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harvard business review, vol.71, pp.75-86, 1993.

J. F. Moore, The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems, 1996.

G. Morgan, Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative science quarterly, pp.605-622, 1980.

S. Naeem, Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm, Ecology, vol.83, pp.1537-1552, 2002.

R. Nelson and S. Winter, The Evolutionary Theory of the Firm, Nonaka, 1982.

J. Ntsondé and F. Aggeri, Building Responsible Innovation Ecosystem, a new approach for interorganizational cooperation, EURAM Conference, 2017.

M. D. Pagel, K. Pandza, and R. Holt, Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems, Encyclopedia of evolution, vol.1, pp.347-65, 2002.

X. Parisot, Critical perspectives on the Business Ecosystem Biological Metaphor, Gratacap A. et al. Understanding Business Ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of convergence? p, pp.22-38, 2013.

X. Parisot, How Open Innovation logics impact the emergence of Business Ecosystems in the French Bioindustries? Philosophical Dissertation, LIRSA, 2015.

X. Parisot, T. Isckia, P. Vialle, and H. Throngvid, Comment définir les phénomènes de coévolution en management stratégique ? in Neuvièmes journées du Groupe Thématique Innovation de l'AIMS, Communautés, écosystèmes et innovation, pp.1-32, 2018.

A. Pellinen, P. Ritala, K. Järvi, and L. M. Sainio, Taking initiative in market creation-a business ecosystem actor perspective, International Journal of Business Environment, vol.5, pp.140-158, 2012.

M. Peltoniemi and E. Vuori, Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments, Proceedings of eBusiness research forum, vol.2, 2004.

D. Pimentel, Animal population regulation by the genetic feedback mechanism, American Naturalist, vol.95, pp.65-79, 1961.

T. B. Porter, Coevolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment, Organization & Environment, vol.19, issue.4, pp.479-504, 2006.

K. Rong, Y. Lin, B. Li, T. Burström, L. Butel et al., Business ecosystem research agenda: more dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized, Asian Business Management, vol.17, pp.167-182, 2018.

D. W. Schemske, Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant-animal mutualisms, Coevolution, pp.67-109, 1983.

V. Shelford, Animal Communities in Temperate America, 1913.

K. G. Smith, C. J. Collins, and K. D. Clark, Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms, Academy of Management Journal, vol.48, pp.346-57, 2005.

A. G. Tansley, The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms, Ecology, vol.16, issue.3, pp.284-307, 1935.

D. J. Teece, Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic management journal, vol.28, pp.1319-1350, 2007.

D. J. Teece, Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms, pp.211-225, 2017.

J. N. Thompson, Concepts of coevolution, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.4, pp.179-183, 1989.

D. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, vol.18, issue.7, pp.509-533, 1997.

J. Thompson, The coevolutionary process, 1994.

R. Tourangeau and L. Rips, Interpreting and evaluating metaphors, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.30, issue.4, pp.452-472, 1991.

H. Tsoukas, The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science, Academy of management review, vol.16, issue.3, pp.566-585, 1991.

M. C. Urban, M. A. Leibold, P. Amarasekare, L. De-meester, R. Gomulkiewicz et al., The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities, Trends in ecology & evolution, vol.23, issue.6, pp.311-317, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00525541

K. Valkokari, M. Seppänen, M. Mäntylä, and S. Jylhä-ollila, Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: A qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies, Technology Innovation Management Review, vol.7, issue.3, 2017.

A. H. Van-de-ven and R. Garud, The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. Evolutionary dynamics of organizations, p.443, 1994.

C. H. Waddington, Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters Walsh, Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, vol.16, pp.57-91, 1942.

, Business Horizons (2.58)

, Business Strategy Review

, California Management Review (3.30)

, European Business Review

, European Management Journal, issue.2, p.36

V. Shelford, Animal Communities in Temperate America, vol.242, p.pp, 1913.

C. S. Elton, The Pattern of Animal Communities, 1966.

C. S. Elton, The nature and origin of soilpolygons in Spitsbergen, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, vol.83, issue.1-5, p.163, 1927.

A. G. Tansley, The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms, Ecology, vol.16, issue.3, pp.284-307, 1935.

R. L. Lindeman, The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology, Ecology, vol.23, issue.4, pp.399-417, 1942.

D. Pimentel, Animal population regulation by the genetic feedback mechanism, American Naturalist, vol.95, pp.65-79, 1961.

G. E. Hutchinson, The ecological theater and the evolutionary play, Evolutionary ecology: concepts and case studies, 1965.

S. Naeem, Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm, Ecology, vol.83, pp.1537-1552, 2002.

P. Ehrlich and P. Raven, Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. Macmillan. New York. "[?] evolution in which the fitness of each genotype depends on the population densities and genetic composition of a given species itself and the species with which it interacts, Population Ecology Roughgarden, J, vol.18, p.480, 1964.

G. Bateson, A stochastic system of evolutionary change in which two or more species interact in such a way that changes in species A set the stage for the natural selection of changes in species B. Later changes in species B, in turn, set the stage for the selecting of more similar changes in species A, p.277, 1979.

D. Anthropology-janzen, In summury, I plead for the retention of the usefulness of 'coevolution' by removing it from synonymy of usage with 'interaction', 'symbiosis, vol.34, p.611, 1980.

, How pervasive is coevolution, Evolutionary Ecology, issue.2, pp.1-19, 1983.

. Coevolution, M. Sunderland, and . Associates, [the] key feature is that the selective factor that 'stimulates evolution in one species is itself responsive to that evolution, Futuyama & Slatkin, p.480, 1983.

, Evolutionary Ecology

J. N. Thompson, Concepts of coevolution, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.4, issue.6, pp.179-183, 1989.

S. Kauffman, Biological] ecosystems are not totally connected. Typically, each species interacts with a subset of the total number of other species, hence the system has some extended web structure, p.255, 1993.

, Evolutionary Ecology

G. Caldarelli, Modelling coevolution in multispecies communities, J. Theor. Biol, vol.193, pp.345-358, 1998.

, Multi-species coevolution affects emergent community structure or ecosystem functioning, Ecosystem Ecology

S. Y. Strauss, Toward a more traitcentered approach to diffuse (co)evolution, New Phytol, vol.165, pp.81-90, 2005.

, The evolution of two species in response to each other is altered by the occurrence of a third species, Evolutionary Ecology

K. Y. Yip, Coevolution (covariation/correlated mutation) is the change of a biological object triggered by the change of a related object, Bioinformatics, vol.24, issue.2, pp.290-292, 2007.