J. S. Alper and M. Bridger, Mathematics, Models and Zeno's Paradoxes, Synthese, vol.110, pp.143-166, 1997.

C. Antonopoulos, Moving without being where you're not; A non-bivalent way, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol.35, pp.235-259, 2004.

V. Ardourel, A discrete solution for the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise, Synthese, vol.192, pp.2843-2861, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929811

F. Arntzenius, Are there really instantaneous velocities? The Monist, vol.83, pp.187-208, 2000.

D. Atkinson, Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol.38, pp.170-180, 2007.

G. Bachelard, La formation de l'esprit scientifique, Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques, 1934.

P. Benacerraf, Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics, Zeno's paradoxes, pp.103-129, 1970.

H. Bergson, Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France, L'évolution créatrice, 1907.

H. Bergson, La pensée et le mouvant, Essais et conférences, 1903.

E. W. Beth, Historical studies in traditional philosophy, Synthese, vol.5, issue.5-6, pp.258-270, 1946.

M. Blay, Penser avec l'infini : La fécondité d'une notion mathématique et philosophique, de Giordano Bruno aux Lumières, 2010.

J. W. Carroll, Instantaneous Motion, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol.110, issue.1, pp.49-67, 2002.

M. Caveing, Zénon d'Élée, prolégomènes aux doctrines du continu: étude historique et critique des fragments et témoignages, 1982.

B. Dowden, Zeno's Paradoxes, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017.

A. Sept, , 2017.

J. A. Faris, The paradoxes of Zeno, 1996.

(. Brookfield, . Vt, and . Usa),

D. W. Graham, Heraclitus, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015.

A. Sept, , 2017.

A. Grünbaum, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes, 1967.

A. Grünbaum, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradox of Motion, Zeno's paradoxes, pp.200-250, 1970.

C. L. Hamblin, Starting and stopping, The Monist, vol.53, issue.3, pp.410-425, 1969.

R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, Physica by Aristotle (translation), The Woks of Aristotle, vol.II, 1930.

A. Sept, , 2017.

C. Harrison, The Three Arrows of Zeno : Cantorian and Non-Cantorian Concepts of the Continuum and of Motion Synthese, vol.107, pp.271-292, 1996.

P. S. Hasper, Zeno Unlimited. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol.30, pp.49-85, 2006.

N. Huggett, Zeno's Paradoxes, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010.

A. Sept, , 2017.

F. Jackson and R. Pargetter, A Question about Rest and Motion, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol.53, issue.1, pp.141-146, 1988.

W. James, Some problems of philosophy: A beginning of an introduction to philosophy, 1911.

M. Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, 1980.

G. S. Kirk and J. E. Raven, The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 1957.

A. Sept, , 2017.

M. Lange, How Can Instantaneous Velocity Fulfill Its Causal Role?, The Philosophical Review, vol.114, issue.4, pp.433-468, 2005.

J. P. Laraudogoitia, A Beautiful Supertask. Mind, 105, pp.81-83, 1996.

J. P. Laraudogoitia, Zeno and flow of information, Synthese, vol.190, pp.439-447, 2013.

J. Lear, A note on Zeno's arrow, Phronesis, vol.26, issue.2, pp.91-104, 1981.

C. Lee, Nonconservation of momentum in classical mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol.42, pp.68-73, 2011.

P. ?ukowski, Trends in Logic, vol.31, 2011.

P. Lynds, Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs, Discontinuity. Found. Phys. Lett, vol.16, issue.4, pp.343-355, 2003.

J. Mazur, The Motion Paradox: The 2,500-year-old Puzzle Behind All the Mysteries of Time and Space, 2007.

B. Medlin, The Origin of Motion, Mind, vol.72, issue.286, pp.155-175, 1963.

U. Meyer, The Metaphysics of velocity, Philosophical Studies, vol.112, pp.93-102, 2003.

C. Mortensen, The limits of change, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol.63, issue.1, pp.1-10, 1985.

A. Nehamas, Parmenidean Being/ Heraclitean Fire, Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, pp.45-64, 2002.

G. E. Owen, Zeno and the Mathematicians, vol.LVIII, 1957.

A. Papa-grimaldi, Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and Parmenides' Prohibition. The Review of Metaphysics, vol.50, pp.299-314, 1996.

J. Peijnenburg and D. Atkinson, Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls, History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol.25, pp.187-201, 2008.

G. Priest, Inconsistencies in Motion, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol.22, issue.4, pp.339-346, 1985.

P. Reeder, Zeno's arrow and the infinitesimal calculus, Synthese, vol.192, issue.5, pp.1315-1335, 2015.

G. E. Romero, The Collapse of Supertasks, Foundations of Science, vol.19, issue.2, pp.209-216, 2014.

B. Russell, The Problem of Infinity Considered Historically, Zeno's paradoxes, pp.45-58, 1970.

W. C. Salmon, Zeno's paradoxes, 1970.

F. A. Shamsi, Towards a definitive solution of Zeno's paradoxes, 1973.

P. M. Sherwood, Vibrational Spectroscopy of Solids, 1972.

J. W. Smith, Time, change and contradiction, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol.68, issue.2, pp.178-188, 1990.

S. R. Smith, Are instantaneous velocities real and really instantaneous?: an argument for the affirmative, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol.34, pp.261-280, 2003.

J. F. Thomson, Tasks and Super-Tasks, Analysis, vol.15, issue.1, pp.1-13, 1954.

M. Tooley, Defense of the Existence of States of Motion. Philosophical Topics, vol.16, pp.225-254, 1988.

G. Vlastos, A note on Zeno's arrow, Phronesis, vol.11, issue.1, pp.3-18, 1966.

M. J. White, Zeno's arrow, divisible infinitesimals, and Chrysippus, Phronesis, vol.27, issue.3, pp.239-254, 1982.

J. O. Wisdom, Achilles on a Physical Racecourse, Zeno's paradoxes, pp.82-88, 1970.

, He defended his thesis in 2006 and since then he occupied several post-doctoral positions at Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier, France. During his PhD, a scientific controversy in a specific polymerization process led him to be interested, first, in history of chemical kinetics theories. Then, since chemistry and physics merge together at the fundamental level, he was rapidly interested in the construction of the modern atomic theory. He is mostly self-educated in history and philosophy of sciences, History and Philosophy of Sciences, 2003.