S. P. Akyol, J. Key, and K. Krishna, Hit or miss? Test taking behavior in multiple choice exams, 2016.

N. Barberis, M. Huang, and R. Thaler, Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing, American Economic Review, vol.96, pp.1069-1090, 2006.

N. Barberis and M. Huang, The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle, Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium, 2008.

Y. Bereby-meyer, J. Meyer, and O. M. Flascher, Prospect theory analysis of guessing in multiple choice tests, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.15, pp.313-327, 2002.

L. B. Bliss, A test of Lord's assumption regarding examinee guessing behavior on multiple-choice tests using elementary school students, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.17, pp.147-153, 1980.

D. V. Budescu and B. Nevo, Optimal number of options: An investigation of the assumption of proportionality, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.22, pp.183-196, 1985.

D. V. Budescu and M. Bar-hillel, To guess or not to guess: A decisiontheoretic view of formula scoring, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.30, issue.4, pp.277-291, 1993.

D. V. Budescu and Y. Bo, Analyzing test-taking behavior: Decision theory meets psychometric theory, P sychometrika, vol.80, issue.4, pp.1105-1122, 2015.

R. F. Burton, Quantifying the eects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: question selection and guessing of answers, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.26, pp.41-50, 2001.

R. F. Burton, Multiple choice and true/false tests: reliability measures and some implications of negative marking, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.29, pp.585-595, 2004.

R. F. Burton and D. J. Miller, Statistical modelling of multiple-choice and true/false tests: ways of considering, and of reducing, the uncertainties attributable to guessing, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.24, issue.4, pp.399-411, 1999.

R. L. Ebel, Blind guessing on objective achievement tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.5, pp.321-325, 1968.

R. L. Ebel, Essentials of educational measurement, Englewood Clis, 1979.

L. H. Cross and R. B. Frary, An empirical test of Lord's theoretical results regarding formula-scoring of multiple-choice tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.14, pp.313-321, 1977.

J. Diamond and W. Evans, The correction for guessing, Review of Educational Research, vol.43, pp.181-191, 1973.

M. P. Espinosa and J. Gardeazabal, Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.54, issue.5, pp.415-425, 2010.

R. B. Frary, Formula scoring of multiple-choice tests (correction for guessing), Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, vol.7, pp.33-38, 1988.

L. M. Harvill, Standard error of measurement, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol.10, pp.33-41, 1991.

C. Heath and A. Tversky, Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.4, issue.1, pp.5-28, 1991.

K. J. Holzinger, On scoring multiple-response tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.15, pp.445-447, 1924.

N. Iriberri and P. Rey-biel, Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: gender dierences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural eld experiment, 2018.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.263-92, 1979.

F. J. Kelly, The Kansas silent reading tests, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.7, issue.2, pp.63-80, 1916.

G. Keren, Calibration and probability judgments: conceptual and methodological issues, Acta Psychologica, vol.77, pp.217-273, 1991.

E. Lesage, M. Valcke, and A. Sabbe, Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education -Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking?, Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol.39, pp.118-193, 2013.

S. Lichtenstein and B. Fischho, Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.20, pp.159-183, 1977.

F. M. Lord, Formula scoring and number-right scoring, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.12, pp.7-12, 1975.

D. Mattson, The eects of guessing on the standard error of measurement and the reliability of test scores, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.25, pp.727-730, 1975.

R. P. Mcdonald, Test theory: A unied treatment, 1999.

T. Pekkarinen, Gender dierences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol.115, pp.94-110, 2015.

R. Pintner, Intelligence testing, 1923.

D. Read, G. Loewenstein, and M. Rabin, Choice bracketing, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.19, issue.13, pp.171-197, 1999.

M. C. Rodriguez, Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol.24, pp.3-13, 2005.

A. C. Sheris and D. S. Boomer, Who is penalized by the penalty for guessing?, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.45, pp.81-90, 1954.

L. L. Thurstone, A method for scoring tests, Psychological Bulletin, vol.16, pp.235-240, 1919.

R. E. Traub and G. L. Rowley, Understanding reliability, Educational measurement: Issues and practice, vol.10, pp.37-45, 1991.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, vol.211, pp.453-458, 1981.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.5, pp.297-323, 1992.

D. F. Votaw, The eect of do-not-guess directions on the validity of truefalse or multiple-choice tests, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.27, pp.698-703, 1936.

J. F. Yates, Judgment and decision making, 1990.