V. Boguslauskas and R. Adlyte, Evaluation of Criteria for the Classification of Enterprises, Inzinerine EkonomikaEngineering Economics, vol.21, issue.2, pp.119-127, 2010.

J. P. Brans, B. Mareschal, and P. Vincke, Promethee: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, Operational Research, vol.84, pp.477-490, 1986.

W. K. Brauers, E. K. Zavadskas, F. Peldschus, and Z. Turskis, Multi-objective decision-making for road design, Transport, vol.23, issue.3, pp.183-193, 2008.

W. K. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, Multi-Objective Optimization In Location Theory With A Simulation For A Department Store, Transformations in Business and Economics, vol.7, issue.3, pp.163-183, 2008.

R. Ciegis and D. Streimikiene, Integration of Sustainable Development Indicators into Sustainable Development Programmes, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, issue.2, pp.7-13, 2005.

J. T. Caciopo and G. G. Berntson, Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasison the separability of positive and negative substrates, Psychological Bulletin, vol.115, pp.401-423, 1994.

C. Coello and C. A. , Empirical Study of Evolutionary Techniques for Multiobjective Optimization in Engineering Design, 1998.

P. Danenas and G. Gintautas, Support Vector Machines and their Application in Credit Risk Evaluation Process, Transformations in Business and Economics, vol.8, issue.3, pp.46-58, 2009.

D. Dubois and H. Fargier, Qualitative decision making with bipolar information, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org), 2006.

J. P. Ignizio, Goal Programming and Extensions, 1976.

R. Liaudanskiene, L. Ustinovicius, and A. Bogdanovicius, Evaluation of Construction Process Safety Solutions Using the TOPSIS Method, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, issue.4, pp.32-40, 2009.

D. G. Luenberger, Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 1984.

C. E. Osgood, G. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, Cours d'Economie, 1896.

V. Podvezko, Application of AHP Technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol.10, issue.2, pp.181-189, 2009.
DOI : 10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.181-189

B. Roy and D. Bouyssou, Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas, Edition Economica, 1993.

T. Saaty, The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, 2005.
DOI : 10.4018/9781591407027.ch018

P. Salminen, J. Hokkanen, and R. Lahdelma, Multicriteria Decision Analysis Project on Environmental Problems, 1996.

G. Shevchenko, L. Ustinovichius, and A. Andruskevicius, Multi-Attribute Analysis Of Investments Risk Alternatives In Construction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol.14, issue.3, pp.428-443, 2008.

H. A. Simon, Administrative Behavior. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations, Fourth Edition, 1997.

R. E. Steuer, Multicriteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application, 1986.

W. C. Stirling, Satisficing Games and Decision Making: With Applications to Engineering and Computer Science, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511543456

A. P. Tchangani, SANPEV: a Satisficing Analytic Network Process framework for Efficiency eValuation of alternatives, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences Journal, pp.291-319, 2006.

A. P. Tchangani, A Satisficing Game Theory Approach for Group Evaluation of Production Units. Decision Support Systems, vol.42, pp.778-788, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02134728

A. P. Tchangani, Modelling Selecting and Ranking Alternatives characterized by Multiple Attributes to satisfy Multiple Objectives, Journal of Information and Computing Science, vol.4, issue.1, pp.3-16, 2009.

A. P. Tchangani, Quantitative modelling of benchmarking process, International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, vol.2, issue.5, pp.614-633, 2010.
DOI : 10.1504/ijmor.2010.034343
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02114175

A. P. Tchangani and F. Pérès, BOCR Framework for Decision Analysis, Proceedings of 12 IFAC Symposium on Large Scale Systems: Theory and Applications, LSS'2010, pp.11-14, 2010.
DOI : 10.3182/20100712-3-fr-2020.00083
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00728578

Z. Turskis, E. K. Zavadskas, and F. Peldschus, Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, issue.1, pp.7-17, 2009.

T. Vilutiene and E. K. Zavadskas, Application of Multicriteria Analysis to Motivate the Degree of Utility of Building Maintenance Variant, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, issue.3, pp.33-39, 2003.

P. Vincke, L'aide multicritere a la decision, 1989.

E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and J. Tamosaitiene, Contractor Selection Of Construction In A Competitive Environment, Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol.9, issue.3, pp.181-187, 2008.

E. K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, and T. Vilutiene, Multicriteria evaluation of apartment blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study, International journal of Strategic Property Management, vol.13, issue.4, pp.319-338, 2009.

E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, A New Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method In Multicriteria DecisionMaking. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol.16, pp.159-172, 2010.

E. Zitzler, Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications, 1999.

P. Ayeley and . Tchangani-dvejop?-pob?d?-savybi?, Suprasti akcinink? nuomones tam, kad efektyviai b?t? galima spr?sti ar pasirinkti sprendim? tiek vie?ame, tiek priva?iame versle, yra labai sud?tinga. Tai, kad sud?tinga, parodo in?inerin?s ekonomikos sprendimai, kurie pasi?ymi ?iomis savyb?mis: daugybe po?ymi?, veik?j? arba akcinink? (reikia atsi?velgti ? daugel? nuomoni?), netikrumu, kuris yra b?dingas in?inerin?s ekonomikos sprendimams tiek formuluojant tikslus, tiek vertinant sprendimus, kai akcinink? nuomon?s yra prie?ingos. Atsi?velgiant ? ?? sud?tingum?, sprendimus priimantys in?inieriai ir specialistai turi sukurti sistem?, kuri pad?t? analizuoti ir rekomenduoti efektyviausius sprendimus. Literat?roje yra daugyb? po?i?ri?, kurie susij? su sprendim? problemomis, t. y. atvej?, kai alternatyvas apib?dina arba veikiantieji asmenys

K. Po?i?riai and . Priklauso-nuo-vadinam?j?-pareto, J? rezultatas priklauso nuo dviej? aspekt?: paie?kos ir sprendimo pri?mimo. Atsi?velgiant ? tai, kaip paie?kos ir sprendim? procesai yra susieti, autoriai klasifikuoja sprendimus arba optimizacijos metodus ? tris veiksmus: sprendimas prie? paie?k?, paie?ka prie? sprendim?

, Buvo nustatyta j? nauda optimizuojant sunkias funkcijas, kurios apima daugyb? parametr? arba j? konfig?racij?. ?iame straipsnyje pateiktas naujas po?i?ris, integruojantis visas sprendim? pri?mimo sudedam?sias dalis (daug dalyvi?, tiksl?, akcinink? bei netikrum?), kurios buvo paai?kintos anks?iau. Pagrindin? ?io po?i?rio mintis yra savybi? poliari?kumas, atsi?velgiant ? tikslus, kurie yra b?dingi realaus pasaulio problem? pasirinkimui. Esant pasirinktam tikslui, egzistuoja tos savyb?s, kuri? variacijos teigiamai koreliuoja su tikslu, ir tos, kurios derinamos neigiamai (ma?esn? yra geresn?). Tai pasteb?jus sukuriama bendra ?io straipsnio id?ja. Taigi po?ymiai, Pirmuoju po?i?riu, kuris skirtas daugybei objektyvi? sprendim? spr?sti, tikslai sutelkiami ? vien? bendr? kai kuriais atvejais skatinant? apribojim? metodus. ?i? metod? prana?umas yra tas, kad efektyv?s algoritmai, skirti atskiroms optimizacijos problemoms analizuoti, gali b?ti panaudoti i?kilusioms problemoms spr?sti. ?i? metod? tr?kumas yra tas, kad reikia vartotojo intervencijos, kad galima b?t? nustatyti veiksnius, kurie lemia sprendimus

, Kitas svarbus ?iame straipsnyje aptartas aspektas -nereikalinga, kad alternatyvas apib?dint? tie patys po?ymiai. Svarbu, sukurti palaikan?i? arba atmetan?i? s?veik? tarp ?i? po?ymi? ir sprendim?. ?i proced?ra naudojama realaus pasaulio problemoms spr?sti. Kuriamos specialios grup?s tam

, Rakta?od?iai: atrankos ir klasifikacijos alternatyvos, sud?tin?s savyb?s, dvipoliari?kumas, daugiausia tikslai, vykdytoj? gausa, tenkinantys ?aidimai. View publication stats View publication stats