M. Bosch and Y. Chevallard, La sensibilité de l'activité mathématique aux ostensifs. Objet d'étude et problématique, Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, vol.19, issue.1, pp.77-124, 1999.

B. Calmette and J. Boilevin, Le modèle investigation-structuration et l'actualité des tensions autour des constructivismes, Recherche en Didactique des Sciences et Technologies, vol.9, pp.103-128, 2014.

M. Coquidé, Le rapport expérimental au vivant. Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches, 2000.

M. C. Croset and H. Chaachoua, Une réponse à la prise en compte de l'apprenant dans la TAD : la praxéologie personnelle, Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, vol.36, issue.2, pp.1-34, 2016.

E. Etkina, A. Karelina, and M. Villasenor, Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.19, pp.54-98, 2010.

C. Hmelo-silver, R. G. Duncan, and C. A. Chinn, Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Educational Psychologist, vol.42, issue.2, pp.99-107, 2006.

A. Laugier and A. Dumont, L'équation de réaction: Un noeud d'obstacles difficilement franchissable, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, vol.1, issue.5, pp.51-68, 2004.

A. Lejeune and V. Guéraud, Embedding observation means into the learning scenario: Authoring approach and environment for simulations-based learning, Proceedings of the 12 th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp.273-275, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00873890

D. C. Washington and . Usa,

P. Marzin-janvier, Comment donner du sens aux activités expérimentales ? Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Joseph-Fourier, 2013.

T. Mcmanus, Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advanced organizers, and self-regulated learners, Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, vol.11, issue.3, pp.219-251, 2000.

M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, L. A. Siiman, T. De-jong, S. A. Van-riesen et al., Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle, Educational Research Review, vol.14, pp.47-61, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206700

S. Puntambekar and J. L. Kolodner, Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: helping students learn science from design, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.42, issue.2, pp.185-217, 2005.

C. Quintana, B. Reiser, J. Davis, E. , A. Krajcik et al., A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.13, issue.3, pp.337-386, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00699773

V. J. Shute, Focus on formative feedback, Review of Educational Research, vol.78, issue.1, pp.153-189, 2008.

Z. C. Zacharia, C. Manoli, N. Xenofontos, T. Jong, . De et al., Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.63, issue.2, pp.257-302, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206410