A. Alexiadou, P. Law, A. Meinunger, and C. Wilder, The syntax of Relative Clauses, John Benjamins, 2000.

A. Alsina, Predicate Composition: A Theory of Syntactic Function Alternations, 1993.

A. Altan, A place in our soul"). Alk?m Yay?nevi, 2004.

J. M. Anderson, Modern Grammars of Case, 2006.

N. Asher, Reference to abstract objects in discourse, 1993.

T. Banguo?lu, Turkish Grammar").Türk Dil Kurumu Yay?nlar? 528, 2000.

G. Booij, Coordination Reduction in Complex Words: A Case for Prosodic Phonology, Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, pp.143-160, 1985.

R. D. Borsley and J. Kornfilt, Mixed extended projections. In: The nature and function of Syntactic Categories, Syntax and Semantics, vol.32, pp.101-131, 2000.

J. Bresnan, S. Mchombo, and A. , The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.13, pp.181-254, 1995.

J. Bresnan, Mixed categories as head sharing constructions, proceedings of the LFG 97 conference, pp.1-17, 1997.

N. Chomsky, Remarks on Nominalization, Ginn, and Company, pp.184-221, 1970.

N. Chomsky, Aspects of the theory of syntax, 1965.

W. Croft, Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: the cognitive organization of information, 1991.

W. Croft, Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs, Semantics and the lexicon, Pustejovsky, pp.55-72, 1995.

É. Á. Csató, Two types of complement clauses in Turkish, The Mainz meeting, pp.107-122, 2010.

D. Sciullo, A. M. Williams, and E. , On the Definition of Word, 1987.

E. Taylan and E. , Temporal/aspectual adverbs and the verb form in Turkish. Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Jacobs R.A., 2001.

P. S. Rosenbaum and C. Ginn, , pp.83-98

A. Göksel, The auxiliary verb-ol at the morphology-syntax interface, The verb in Turkish, Erguvanl? Taylan E, pp.151-181, 2001.

A. Göksel and C. Kerslake, Turkish. A comprehensive grammar, 2005.

J. Grimshaw, Argument structure, 1990.

J. Grimshaw, Extended projections, 1991.

M. Hengirmen, Dictionary of linguistic and grammatical terms"). Engin Yay?nevi, 1999.

H. Kamp and U. Reyle, From discourse to logic, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-017-1616-1
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-94-017-1616-1%2F1.pdf

Y. K?l?çaslan, A situation-theoretic approach to case marking semantics in Turkish, Lingua, vol.116, pp.112-144, 2006.

. Kiparsky, C. Kiparsky, K. Heidolph, and H. , Fact, Progress in Linguistics Bierwisch M and, p.143173, 1970.

Z. Korkmaz, A grammar of Turkish: morphology"), 1224 pages, TDK Yay?nlar?, vol.827, 2003.

J. Kornfilt, Functional projections and their subjects in Turkish clauses, John Benjamins, pp.183-212, 2001.
DOI : 10.1075/la.44.08kor

J. Kornfilt, Subject case in Turkish nominalized clauses, Syntactic structures and Morphological Information, U. Junghanns and L, 2003.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110904758.129

J. Kornfilt, W. , and J. , Afterword: nominalizations in syntactic theory, Lingua, vol.121, pp.1305-1306, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.008

M. Kural, L. Johanson, É. Á. Csató, V. Locke, A. Menz et al., Subordinate Infl and Comp in Turkish, Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Turkish Linguistics. Otto Harrassowitz, pp.404-422, 1998.

G. Leech, , 1974.

R. B. Lees, The grammar of English nominalizations, 1963.

G. Mungan, Türkçede Fiillerden Türetilmi? Isimlerin Morfolojik ve Semantik Yönden Incelenmesi (A Study in the Morphology and Semantics of, 2002.

, Deverbal Nouns in Turkish) Simurg. Istanbul

M. Nakipo?lu, The semantics of the Turkish accusative marked definites and the relation between prosodic structure and information structure, Lingua, 119, pp.1253-1280, 2009.

M. Nespor, The Phonological Word in Italian, Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, pp.193-204

C. Pollard and Y. Sag, Head driven phrase structure grammar, 1994.

P. M. Postal, Cross-over phenomena, 1971.

G. Pullum and K. , English nominal gerund phrases as noun phrases with verbphrase heads, Linguistics, vol.29, pp.763-799, 1991.

J. Pustejovsky, The Generative Lexicon, 1995.

P. S. Rosenbaum, The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, 1967.

J. Simpson, Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax. : A Lexicalist Approach, 1991.

L. Talmy, Toward a cognitive semantics. A Bradford Book, 2000.

R. Underhill, , 1976.

G. Van-schaaik, The order of nominalizations in Turkish, Turkic Languages, vol.3, pp.87-120, 1999.

Z. Vendler, Linguistics in Philosophy, Glosses In our glosses the following abbreviations are used: LC: linking consonant, LV: linking vowel PL: plural SG: singular GEN: genitive POS: noun possessive marker, ACC: accusative PAS: passive ABL: ablative DAT: dative ASP: aspect PT: past PER: person 1 st : 1 st person 2 nd : 2 nd person 3 rd : 3 rd person NOM: nominalizing suffix, 1967.

, LOC: locative DAT: dative CS: Causative INT: interrogative NEG: negation