C. Heyes, Automatic imitation, Psychological bulletin, vol.137, issue.3, p.463, 2011.
DOI : 10.1037/a0022288
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00690057

S. J. Blakemore and C. Frith, The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action, Neuropsychologia, vol.43, issue.2, pp.260-267, 2005.

C. Becchio, A. Pierno, M. Mari, D. Lusher, and U. Castiello, Motor contagion from gaze: The case of autism, Brain, vol.130, issue.9, pp.2401-2411, 2007.

G. Ganesh and T. Ikegami, Beyond Watching: Action Understanding by Humans and Implications for Motion Planning by Interacting Robots. In: Dance Notations and Robot Motion, pp.139-167, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_7

T. Ikegami and G. Ganesh, Watching novice action degrades expert motor performance: causation between action production and outcome prediction of observed actions by humans, Scientific reports, vol.4, p.6989, 2014.

H. Hillebrandt, K. J. Friston, and S. J. Blakemore, Effective connectivity during animacy perception-dynamic causal modelling of Human Connectome Project data, Scientific reports, vol.4, p.6240, 2014.

T. Chaminade, E. Oztop, G. Cheng, and M. Kawato, From self-observation to imitation: Visuomotor association on a robotic hand, Brain research bulletin, vol.75, issue.6, pp.775-784, 2008.

E. Oztop, D. W. Franklin, T. Chaminade, and G. Cheng, Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human?, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, vol.2, issue.04, pp.537-559, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/ichr.2004.1442688

J. M. Kilner, Y. Paulignan, and S. J. Blakemore, An interference effect of observed biological movement on action, Current biology, vol.13, issue.6, pp.522-525, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00654873

A. Sciutti, A. Bisio, F. Nori, G. Metta, L. Fadiga et al., Measuring human-robot interaction through motor resonance, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.4, issue.3, pp.223-234, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-012-0143-1
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12369-012-0143-1.pdf

A. Vasalya, G. Ganesh, and A. Kheddar, Distinct motor contagions during and after observation of action by a humanoid co-worker, International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2018.

L. Noy, R. I. Rumiati, and T. Flash, Simple movement imitation: Are kinematic features sufficient to map perceptions into actions? Brain and cognition, vol.69, pp.360-368, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.030

J. Kilner, H. Afdc, and S. J. Blakemore, Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion, Social neuroscience, vol.2, issue.3-4, pp.158-166, 2007.

A. Bisio, N. Stucchi, M. Jacono, L. Fadiga, and T. Pozzo, Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity, PLoS One, vol.5, issue.10, p.13506, 2010.

A. Bisio, A. Sciutti, F. Nori, G. Metta, L. Fadiga et al., Motor contagion during human-human and human-robot interaction, PloS one, vol.9, issue.8, p.106172, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01159608

A. Kupferberg, S. Glasauer, M. Huber, M. Rickert, A. Knoll et al., Video observation of humanoid robot movements elicits motor interference, Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, Adaptive and Emergent Behaviour and Complex Systems Convention (AISB)

A. Kupferberg, M. Huber, B. Helfer, C. Lenz, A. Knoll et al., Moving just like you: motor interference depends on similar motility of agent and observer, PloS one, vol.7, issue.6, p.39637, 2012.

M. Brass, H. Bekkering, and W. Prinz, Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task, Acta psychologica, vol.106, issue.1-2, pp.3-22, 2001.

C. Press, G. Bird, R. Flach, and C. Heyes, Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation, Cognitive Brain Research, vol.25, issue.3, pp.632-640, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020

T. Chaminade and G. Cheng, Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics, Journal of Physiology-Paris, vol.103, issue.3-5, pp.286-295, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.011

K. Kaneko, M. Morisawa, S. Kajita, S. Nakaoka, T. Sakaguchi et al., Humanoid robot HRP-2Kai Improvement of HRP-2 towards disaster response tasks, Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on, pp.132-139

L. Biagiotti and C. Melchiorri, Trajectory planning for automatic machines and robots, 2008.

H. Akaike, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, pp.199-213, 1998.

E. Erdfelder, F. Faul, and A. Buchner, GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, vol.28, pp.1-11, 1996.
DOI : 10.3758/bf03203630
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03203630.pdf

J. Verma and P. Verma, Determination of Sample Size and Power Analysis with G*Power Software: Step-wise Illustrated Manual for Research Scholars, 2017.

C. M. Harris and D. M. Wolpert, Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning, Nature, vol.394, issue.6695, p.780, 1998.
DOI : 10.1038/29528

P. M. Fitts, The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, Journal of experimental psychology, vol.47, issue.6, p.381, 1954.

E. Burdet, R. Osu, D. W. Franklin, T. E. Milner, and M. Kawato, The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance, Nature, vol.414, issue.6862, p.446, 2001.
DOI : 10.1038/35106566

D. W. Franklin, E. Burdet, K. P. Tee, R. Osu, C. M. Chew et al., CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm, Journal of neuroscience, vol.28, issue.44, pp.11165-11173, 2008.
DOI : 10.1523/jneurosci.3099-08.2008
URL : http://www.jneurosci.org/content/28/44/11165.full.pdf

G. Ganesh and E. Burdet, Motor planning explains human behaviour in tasks with multiple solutions, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol.61, issue.4, pp.362-368, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.robot.2012.09.024

F. Vannucci, A. Sciutti, M. Jacono, G. Sandini, and F. Rea, Adaptation to a humanoid robot in a collaborative joint task, International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2017.

S. Schaal, D. Sternad, R. Osu, and M. Kawato, Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete, Nature neuroscience, vol.7, issue.10, p.1136, 2004.
DOI : 10.1038/nn1322

A. Tierney and N. Kraus, Auditory-motor entrainment and phonological skills: precise auditory timing hypothesis (PATH), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol.8, p.949, 2014.

A. Schachner, T. F. Brady, I. M. Pepperberg, and M. D. Hauser, Spontaneous motor entrainment to music in multiple vocal mimicking species, Current Biology, vol.19, issue.10, pp.831-836, 2009.

A. Takagi, G. Ganesh, T. Yoshioka, M. Kawato, and E. Burdet, Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner's goal to enhance their movements, Nature Human Behaviour, vol.1, issue.3, p.54, 2017.

J. Fasola and M. J. Matari´cmatari´c, Robot motivator: Increasing user enjoyment and performance on a physical/cognitive task, 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), pp.274-279, 2010.