An algorithmic theory of lattice points in polyhedra, New Perspectives in Algebraic Combinatorics, vol.38, pp.91-147, 1996. ,
, Recall that the Strong Borda Paradox occurs when a CL exists and is selected by a given voting rule
, The Strict Borda Paradox occurs when the voting rule can completely reverse the ranking of the pairwise majority elections. In three-candidate elections, this means that the CL is elected and, at the same time, the CW is ranked last. 6 The probability of Borda paradoxes under IAC can be, 2012.
Computation and manipulation of enumerators of integer projections of parametric polytopes, 2005. ,
Which scoring rule maximizes Condorcet efficiency under IAC?, Theory and Decision, vol.58, pp.145-185, 2005. ,
Parametric analysis of polyhedral iteration spaces, Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, vol.2, issue.19, pp.179-194, 1998. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00534840
The true impact of voting rule selection on Condorcet efficiency, Economics Bulletin, vol.35, issue.4, pp.2418-2426, 2015. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01231013
Borda's paradox with weighted scoring rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, pp.121-136, 2012. ,
An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.64, pp.57-66, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00667660
Sur les polyèdres rationnels homothétiqueshomothétiques`homothétiquesà n dimensions, Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, vol.254, pp.616-618, 1962. ,
Sur unprobì eme de géométrie diophantienne linéaire, vol.226, pp.1-49, 1967. ,
Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles, Public Choice, vol.26, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.1007/bf01725789
Voting paradoxes and group coherence, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-03107-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452
Voters preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet's paradox, Quality and Quantity, vol.49, issue.6, pp.2345-2368, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11135-014-0117-5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452557
Scoring rules and preference restrictions: The Strong Borda Paradox revisited, Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.127, issue.3, pp.375-395, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.3917/redp.273.0375
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01631180
Voter antagonism and the paradox of voting, Econometrica, vol.42, issue.6, pp.1045-1067, 1974. ,
On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.30, issue.3, pp.363-383, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0236-1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01245310
Asymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulation, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.89, pp.70-82, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.06.006
Analytical computation of Ehrhart polynomials: enabling more compiler analysis and optimizations, Proceedings of International Conference on Compilers, Architecture and Synthesis for Embedded Systems, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1023833.1023868