Comparaison de différentes méthodes d'évaluation du coefficient d'utilisation digestive des aliments concentrés par le ruminant - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Annales de zootechnie Année : 1983

Comparaison de différentes méthodes d'évaluation du coefficient d'utilisation digestive des aliments concentrés par le ruminant

Résumé

Digestibility of a ruminant compound feed cannot be directly measured. Various methods have been proposed to evaluate the digestibility coefficients in such a situation and the aim of the present work was to compare systematically these main methods. The data used were derived from measurements obtained with 4 mixed diets (roughage + concentrate) and took into account 16 components (tabl. l, 2, 3). The classical method, or « difference method », gives high unreliable results when the percentage of the component provided by the concentrate in the diet was less than 20 p. 100 (fig. 2). The use of ponderated values did not modify statistically the digestibility coefficients values, but allowed to reduce the safety ranges (fig. 3). Similar conclusions were obtained when individual variations of the roughage digestibility were taken into account instead of a sole mean value (« variable hay difference method) (fig. 4). With the equation-method there was a minimal value of the incertitude which is a function of the number of eliminated data and the value of the minimal difference allowed between two levels of concentrate incorporation (fig. 9). This mean level was about 10 p. 100. A stepwise multiple regression model including the level of concentrate was also used to test phenomena of associative digestibilities, the influence of the feeding level and various interactions. Results obtained with the equation and regression methods were rather similar. They were not so highly correlated with those provided by the difference method (tabi. 5). Comparison of these various methods indicated that the reliability is largely influenced by the mean concentrate percentage, but also by the variations of these percentages. The regression method seemed to be the most suited because its possibility to test simultaneously the influence of different exogenous parameters (fig. 11 and 12). The present study emphasizes the importance of knowing, the specific reliability and the method used to determine each published digestibility coefficient.

Dates et versions

hal-01869872 , version 1 (06-09-2018)

Identifiants

Citer

Sylvie Giger, Daniel Sauvant. Comparaison de différentes méthodes d'évaluation du coefficient d'utilisation digestive des aliments concentrés par le ruminant. Annales de zootechnie, 1983, 32 (2), pp.215-245. ⟨10.1051/animres:19830206⟩. ⟨hal-01869872⟩
13 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More