Difference between electrostriction kinetics, and mechanical response of segmented polyurethane-based EAP
Résumé
Among the key parameters, which must be taken into account for the choice of actuators used as electrical to mechanical energy converters, the response to a step function and/or the frequency dependence of this response is extremely important. For polymeric actuators and more generally for electroactive polymers, three mechanisms can be at the origin of energy losses, namely dielectric relaxations, viscoelastic relaxations and possible electrical conductivity. In a previous paper, we studied the electrical behavior of segmented polyurethanes with different weight fractions of hard (MDI-BDO) and soft (PTMO) segments. They were shown to exhibit three main mechanisms, namely, from the fastest to the slowest, a secondary or β-relaxation, the main or α-relaxation associated with the glass–rubber transition of the soft phase, and finally, their electrical conductivity. In the present work, we present the general viscoelastic response (as measured through mechanical spectrometry) of the same polyurethanes and their respective time dependent electrostriction responses, and compare it with the relaxation characteristic times of electrical and mechanical spectroscopy data.
Mots clés
Polymers
Polyurethanes
Viscoelasticity
Electrical behaviors
Electrical conductivity
Electro-active polymers
Frequency dependence
Mechanical spectroscopy
Segmented polyurethanes
Viscoelastic relaxation
Viscoelastic response
Mechanical actuators
Electrostriction
Energy dissipation
Glass transition
Actuators
Anelastic relaxation
Conducting polymers
Electric conductivity
Mechanisms
Organic polymers