B. , A. Kortum, P. Et, M. , and J. , Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale, Journal of usability studies, vol.4, issue.3, pp.114-123, 2009.

J. Biggs, T. Et, and C. , Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4 e éd, 2011.

P. Black, W. Et, and D. , Assessment and Classroom Learning, 1998.

D. Cohen, R. Et, S. , and J. , Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other, Assessment in Education: Principles, 2014.

B. , J. Caldwell, J. Crouch, C. H. Et, M. et al., SUS : a retrospective Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results, Journal of Usability Studies CBE-Life Sciences Education American journal of physics, vol.8, issue.699, pp.29-40, 2001.

D. Costa, J. Et, S. , and D. K. , Modélisation et implémentation de dispositifs pédagogiques avec BPMN 2.0, Actes de la 7ème conférence sur les Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain, pp.282-287, 2015.

. Repéré-À-httpactes_eiah2015, D. Pdf, F. Segers, M. Et, S. et al., The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: A review, pp.331-350, 1999.

G. , S. Et, D. , and A. , Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system Advances in Physiology Education, 2009.

H. Repéré-À-httprss=1&ssource=mfr, J. Et, J. , and R. , Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, pp.111-122, 1998.

H. , R. Hartley, P. Skelton, and A. , The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning doi:10.1080/0307507012009936 IMS Global Learning Consortium IMS Question & Test Interoperability Specification. Repéré à https://www.imsglobal.org/question/index Formative computer!based assessment in higher education: The effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning, Studies in Higher Education, pp.181-192, 2002.

N. , D. Et, M. , and D. , Formative assessment and self! regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in higher education, pp.31-199, 2006.

. Repéré-À-http-os, B. Omg, R. Os, C. Et, W. et al., Business Process Model And Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. Repéré à http://docs.oasis-open Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: Insights from recent research The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.27, issue.354, pp.475-479, 1998.

S. , D. Et, C. , and M. , Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom, Teaching of Psychology, vol.36, issue.4, pp.273-277, 2009.

S. , F. Vidal, P. Et, B. , J. Pdf et al., Génération semi-automatique de tests d'auto-évaluation pourvus de feedback résultant de la prise de notes collaborative) (p. 144!155) Repéré à https Tsaap-Notes--An Open Microblogging Tool for Collaborative Notetaking during Face-to-Face Lectures Repéré à http Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Actes du Colloque Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication pour l'Enseignement Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp.39-43, 1998.

T. , T. S. Et, S. , and J. N. , A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability, Proceedings of the Usability Professional Association Conference, pp.1-12, 2004.

U. , M. Renko, M. Et, S. , and H. , Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures, BMC Medical Education, vol.3, issue.1, p.12, 2003.