Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue New England Journal of Medicine Année : 2017

Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Xavier Montalban
  • Fonction : Auteur
Stephen Hauser
Ludwig Kappos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Douglas L. Arnold
  • Fonction : Auteur
Amit Bar-Or
  • Fonction : Auteur
Giancarlo Comi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gavin Giovannoni
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 905025
Peter Hartung
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bernhard Hemmer
Fred Lublin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kottil Rammohan
  • Fonction : Auteur
Krzysztof Selmaj
  • Fonction : Auteur
Anthony Traboulsee
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890077
Annette Sauter
  • Fonction : Auteur
Donna Masterman
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paulo Fontoura
  • Fonction : Auteur
Shibeshih Belachew
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hideki Garren
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicole Mairon
  • Fonction : Auteur
Peter Chin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jerry Wolinsky
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

BACKGROUND: An evolving understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis suggests that depleting B cells could be useful for treatment. We studied ocrelizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20-expressing B cells, in the primary progressive form of the disease. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 732 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous ocrelizumab (600 mg) or placebo every 24 weeks for at least 120 weeks and until a prespecified number of confirmed disability progression events had occurred. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks in a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression was 32.9% with ocrelizumab versus 39.3% with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.98; P=0.03). The percentage of patients with 24-week confirmed disability progression was 29.6% with ocrelizumab versus 35.7% with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98; P=0.04). By week 120, performance on the timed 25-foot walk worsened by 38.9% with ocrelizumab versus 55.1% with placebo (P=0.04); the total volume of brain lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decreased by 3.4% with ocrelizumab and increased by 7.4% with placebo (P<0.001); and the percentage of brain-volume loss was 0.90% with ocrelizumab versus 1.09% with placebo (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the change in the Physical Component Summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Infusion-related reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, and oral herpes infections were more frequent with ocrelizumab than with placebo. Neoplasms occurred in 2.3% of patients who received ocrelizumab and in 0.8% of patients who received placebo; there was no clinically significant difference between groups in the rates of serious adverse events and serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of clinical and MRI progression than placebo. Extended observation is required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ORATORIO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01194570 .).

Dates et versions

hal-01793440 , version 1 (16-05-2018)

Identifiants

Citer

Xavier Montalban, Stephen Hauser, Ludwig Kappos, Douglas L. Arnold, Amit Bar-Or, et al.. Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, 376 (3), pp.209 - 220. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1606468⟩. ⟨hal-01793440⟩

Collections

SITE-ALSACE
127 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More