Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice, and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, pp.7348-7355 ,
DOI : 10.1038/495305a
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7348.full.pdf
Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.47 ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00346827
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/114/30/E6089.full.pdf
Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities, Science, vol.112, issue.5783, pp.58-61, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3298564
URL : http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea/Publications/files/journal/JA0236-06.PDF
Pollination and Food Production, IPBES: In Summary for Policymakers of the Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Pollinators, 2016. ,
A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets, Science, vol.39, issue.6195, pp.241-244, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1256734
Counting the books while the library burns: why conservation monitoring programs need a plan for action, Front Ecol Environ, vol.11, pp.549-555, 2013. ,
Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security Pirhofer-Walzl K: Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement, Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci J Appl Ecol, vol.280, issue.47, pp.1166-1168, 2010. ,
Back to the Barriers? Changing Narratives in Biodiversity Conservation, Forum for Development Studies, vol.17, issue.2, pp.341-370, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1080/089419202317174002
Conservation Organizations Need to Consider Adaptive Capacity: Why Local Input Matters, Conservation Letters, vol.12, issue.5, pp.351-360, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00026-7
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12210/pdf
Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: A comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.145, pp.321-329, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.028
A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511721731
IPBES ??? IPCC, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.29, issue.10, pp.543-545, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.004
National indicators for observing ecosystem service change, Global Environmental Change, vol.35, pp.12-21, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.014
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01444833
Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments, Ecological Indicators, vol.52, pp.320-331, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01444859
Assessing the suitability of diversity metrics to detect biodiversity change, Biological Conservation, vol.213, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.024
A suite of essential biodiversity variables for detecting critical biodiversity change, Biological Reviews, vol.36, issue.1709, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s12237-012-9559-y
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01788182
National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review, BioScience, vol.13, issue.10, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1890/140156
How Essential Biodiversity Variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring, Global Ecology and Conservation, vol.10, pp.43-59, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.01.007
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.01.007
Unraveling the Relationships between Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing in Spain, PLoS ONE, vol.10, issue.3, p.73249, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249.s006
The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Its History and Development, Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1993. ,
Think globally, act locally: interconnected place-based social-ecological research isneeded to inform global sustainability, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.005
Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a ???4S??? hierarchy, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.29, issue.11, pp.607-613, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004
Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation: Bridging the Gap Between Global Commitment and Local Action, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9781118490747
Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment, Environmental Politics, vol.26, issue.5, pp.956-963, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1080/09644016.2017.1332543
Environmental science in a post-truth world, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol.15, issue.1, p.3, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1002/fee.1454
The IPBES Conceptual Framework ??? connecting nature and people, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol.14, pp.1-16, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services, Ecological Indicators, vol.66, pp.340-351, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004
Untangling the Environmentalist's Paradox: Why Is Human Well-being Increasing as Ecosystem Services Degrade?, BioScience, vol.314, issue.8, pp.576-589, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1132294
Conservation practitioners' perspectives on decision triggers for evidence-based management, J Appl Ecol, vol.53, pp.1351-1357, 2016. ,
A particular useful study which aims to better understand which biodiversity information is actually used by practitioners in conservation management and at what moment this information should be available. 40 Filling in biodiversity threat gaps, Science, vol.352, pp.416-418, 2016. ,
The biodiversity informatics landscape: elements, connections and opportunities. Res Ideas Outcomes, p.14059, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.3897/rio.3.e14059
URL : http://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14059
Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations?, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol.7, issue.2, pp.612-617, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01473753
Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.23, issue.8, pp.8349-8356 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land-use changes, Global Change Biology, vol.12, issue.7, pp.2505-2515, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1111/gcb.13251
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01444016
Luc Hoffmann, l'homme qui s'obstine à préserver la terre. Phébus, 2010. ,
The challenge of Going Green, Harv Bus Rev, 1994. ,
Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.78, issue.2, pp.194-199, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.016
EDITOR'S CHOICE: How much would it cost to monitor farmland biodiversity in Europe?, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol.45, issue.1, pp.140-149, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.050
Differentiating the effects of climate and land use change on European biodiversity: A scenario analysis, Ambio, vol.114, issue.3, pp.277-290, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.005
Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol.5, issue.5, pp.484-493, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002
URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002
Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development, Futures, vol.38, issue.3, pp.285-311, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.006
Exploring future agricultural development and biodiversity in Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi: a spatially explicit scenario-based assessment, Regional Environmental Change, vol.12, issue.4, pp.1409-1420 ,
DOI : 10.1890/130097