L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.1/3, pp.197-216, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1014490210693

L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons, Modelling dialogues using argumentation, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, pp.31-38, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858428

R. Arisaka and K. Satoh, Voluntary Manslaughter? A Case Study with Meta-Argumentation with Supports, New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2016, pp.241-252, 2017.
DOI : 10.1080/19462160903564592

P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida, AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.52, issue.1, pp.19-37, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004

URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004

P. Besnard and S. Doutre, Checking the acceptability of a set of arguments, 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning Proceedings, pp.59-64, 2004.

J. L. Carballido, J. C. Nieves, and M. Osorio, Inferring preferred extensions by pstable semantics. Inteligencia artificial: Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, pp.38-53, 2009.
DOI : 10.4114/ia.v13i41.1029

URL : http://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/87510/1/R07-26.pdf

C. Cayrol, A. Cohen, and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Towards a new framework for recursive interactions in abstract bipolar argumentation, Proc. of COMMA, pp.191-198, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01474908

C. Cayrol, J. Fandinno, L. Fariñas-del-cerro, and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01709146

A. Cohen, S. Gottifredi, A. J. García, and G. R. Simari, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Journal of Applied Logic, vol.13, issue.4, pp.509-533, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jal.2014.12.001

A. Cohen, S. Gottifredi, A. J. García, and G. R. Simari, On the acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support, Proc. of COMMA, pp.231-242, 2016.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

P. E. Dunne, Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.10-15, pp.10-15701, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.03.006

U. Egly, S. A. Gaggl, and S. Woltran, Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks, 14] S. Modgil. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks, pp.147-1779, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/321978.321991

M. Osorio, J. C. Nieves, and A. Santoyo, Complete Extensions as Clark's Completion Semantics, 2013 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, pp.81-88, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/ENC.2013.18

S. Villata, G. Boella, D. M. Gabbay, and L. Van-der-torre, Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol.21, issue.6, pp.1-4163, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exq054

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01076568