D. Lametti, A. Rochet-capellan, E. Neufeld, D. Shiller, and D. Ostry, Plasticity in the Human Speech Motor System Drives Changes in Speech Perception, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.34, issue.31, pp.10339-10346, 2014.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0108-14.2014

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01053445

D. Shiller, M. Sato, V. Gracco, and S. Baum, Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.125, issue.2, pp.1103-1113, 2009.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3058638

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00366425

S. Nasir and D. Ostry, Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.98, issue.6, pp.20470-20475, 2009.
DOI : 10.1152/jn.00576.2007

URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/106/48/20470.full.pdf

S. Blumstein and K. Stevens, Phonetic features and acoustic invariance in speech, Cognition, vol.10, issue.1-3, pp.25-320010, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90021-4

A. Liberman and I. Mattingly, The motor theory of speech perception revised, Cognition, vol.21, issue.1, pp.1-360010, 1985.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6

K. Stevens, On the quantal nature of speech, Journal of Phonetics, vol.17, pp.3-45, 1989.

C. Fowler, Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.99, issue.3, pp.1730-1741, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.415237

J. Schwartz, A. Basirat, L. Ménard, and M. Sato, The Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception, Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol.25, issue.5, pp.336-354, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.12.004

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00442367

J. Patri, J. Diard, and P. Perrier, Modélisation bayésienne de la planification motrice des gestes de parole: E ´ valuation du rôle des différentes modalités sensorielles, pp.419-427, 2016.

E. Cressman and D. Henriques, Sensory Recalibration of Hand Position Following Visuomotor Adaptation, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.81, issue.6, pp.3505-3518, 2009.
DOI : 10.1152/jn.90544.2008

D. Ostry, M. Darainy, A. Mattar, J. Wong, and P. Gribble, Somatosensory Plasticity and Motor Learning, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.30, issue.15, pp.5384-93, 2010.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4571-09.2010

URL : http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/30/15/5384.full.pdf

C. Moulin-frier, R. Laurent, P. Bessière, J. Schwartz, and J. Diard, Adverse conditions improve distinguishability of auditory, motor, and perceptuo-motor theories of speech perception: An exploratory Bayesian modelling study, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.17, issue.7-8, pp.1240-1263, 2012.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.603

C. Moulin-frier, J. Diard, J. Schwartz, P. Bessière, and . Cosmo, COSMO (???Communicating about Objects using Sensory???Motor Operations???): A Bayesian modeling framework for studying speech communication and the emergence of phonological systems, Journal of Phonetics, vol.53, pp.5-41, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01230175

R. Laurent, M. Barnaud, J. Schwartz, P. Bessière, and J. Diard, The complementary roles of auditory and motor information evaluated in a Bayesian perceptuo-motor model of speech perception., Psychological Review, vol.124, issue.5, p.28471206, 2017.
DOI : 10.1037/rev0000069

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01484383

J. Diard, Bayesian Algorithmic Modeling in Cognitive Science [Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches (HDR)]. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2015.

D. Marr and . Vision, A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, 1982.

M. Barnaud, J. Schwartz, J. Diard, and P. Bessière, Sensorimotor learning in a Bayesian computational model of speech communication, 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), pp.27-32
DOI : 10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846784

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01371719

M. Barnaud, J. Diard, and P. Bessière, Assessing Idiosyncrasies in a Bayesian Model of Speech Communication, Interspeech 2016, pp.2080-2084, 2016.
DOI : 10.21437/Interspeech.2016-396

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01371722

J. Patri, J. Diard, and P. Perrier, Optimal speech motor control and token-to-token variability: a Bayesian modeling approach, Biological Cybernetics, vol.26, issue.9, pp.611-626, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01221738

J. Patri, P. Perrier, and J. Diard, Bayesian Modeling in Speech Motor Control: A Principled Structure for the Integration of Various Constraints, Interspeech 2016, pp.3588-3592, 2016.
DOI : 10.21437/Interspeech.2016-441

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01378928

V. Sanguineti, R. Laboissière, and D. Ostry, A dynamic biomechanical model for neural control of speech production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.103, issue.3, pp.1615-1627, 1998.
DOI : 10.1121/1.421296

B. Atal, J. Chang, M. Mathews, and J. Tukey, Inversion of articulatory???to???acoustic transformation in the vocal tract by a computer???sorting technique, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.63, issue.5, pp.1535-1555, 1978.
DOI : 10.1121/1.381848

S. Cai, S. Ghosh, F. Guenther, and J. Perkell, Focal Manipulations of Formant Trajectories Reveal a Role of Auditory Feedback in the Online Control of Both Within-Syllable and Between-Syllable Speech Timing, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.31, issue.45, pp.16483-16490, 2011.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-11.2011

D. Purcell and K. Munhall, Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.119, issue.4, pp.2288-2297, 2006.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2173514

S. Tremblay, D. Shiller, and D. Ostry, Somatosensory basis of speech production, Nature, vol.71, issue.6942, pp.866-869, 2003.
DOI : 10.1121/1.387254

S. Nasir and D. Ostry, Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults, Nature Neuroscience, vol.92, issue.10, pp.1217-1239, 2008.
DOI : 10.1038/nn.2193

C. Savariaux, P. Perrier, and J. Orliaguet, Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control space in speech production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.98, issue.5, pp.2428-2442, 1995.
DOI : 10.1121/1.413277

J. Houde and M. Jordan, Sensorimotor Adaptation of Speech I, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, vol.45, issue.2, pp.295-3101092, 2002.
DOI : 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023)

S. Scott and R. Wise, The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception, Cognition, vol.92, issue.1-2, pp.13-45, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.12.002

G. Hickok and D. Poeppel, The cortical organization of speech processing, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol.26, issue.5, pp.393-402, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00046-6

J. Rauschecker and S. Scott, Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing, Nature Neuroscience, vol.168, issue.6, pp.718-724, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tins.2005.09.010

A. Friederici, The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.16, issue.5, pp.262-268, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.001

T. Ito, M. Tiede, and D. Ostry, Somatosensory function in speech perception, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.104, issue.3, pp.1245-1253, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00231972

J. Skipper, J. Devlin, and D. Lametti, The hearing ear is always found close to the speaking tongue : Review of the role of the motor system in speech perception, Brain and Language, vol.164, pp.77-105, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.004

E. Gilet, J. Diard, and P. Bessière, Bayesian Action???Perception Computational Model: Interaction of Production and Recognition of Cursive Letters, PLoS ONE, vol.34, issue.7, p.21674043, 2011.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0020387.s001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00645868

M. Kawato, Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol.9, issue.6, pp.718-727, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8

D. Wolpert, R. Miall, and M. Kawato, Internal models in the cerebellum, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.2, issue.9, pp.338-347, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01221-2

M. Jordan and D. Rumelhart, Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher, Cognitive Science, vol.17, issue.3, pp.307-354, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/TSMC.1987.289329

D. Ostry and A. Feldman, A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control, Experimental Brain Research, vol.153, issue.3, pp.275-288, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/s00221-003-1624-0

J. Pilon, D. Serres, S. Feldman, and A. , Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force, Experimental Brain Research, vol.36, issue.1, pp.49-67, 2007.
DOI : 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006261

D. Kleinschmidt and T. Jaeger, Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel., Psychological Review, vol.122, issue.2, pp.148-203, 2015.
DOI : 10.1037/a0038695

D. Boer, B. Kuhl, and P. , Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model, Acoustics Research Letters Online, vol.4, issue.4, pp.129-134, 2003.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1613311

M. Clayards, M. Tanenhaus, R. Aslin, and R. Jacobs, Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues, Cognition, vol.108, issue.3, pp.804-809, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004

M. Clayards, R. Aslin, M. Tanenhaus, and R. Jacobs, Within category phonetic variability affects perceptual uncertainty, Proc. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp.701-704, 2007.

N. Feldman, T. Griffiths, and J. Morgan, The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference., Psychological Review, vol.116, issue.4, pp.752-782, 2009.
DOI : 10.1037/a0017196

C. Fowler, An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective, Status Report on Speech Research, pp.139-169, 1986.

M. Ernst and M. Banks, Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion, Nature, vol.415, issue.6870, pp.429-433, 2002.
DOI : 10.1038/415429a

S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. Ostry, Specificity of Speech Motor Learning, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.28, issue.10, pp.2426-24344196, 2008.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4196-07.2008

A. Rochet-capellan, L. Richer, and D. Ostry, Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.20, issue.6, pp.1711-1717, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0168-0102(03)00094-4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00743786

A. Mattar and D. Ostry, Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.98, issue.6, pp.3321-3329, 2007.
DOI : 10.1152/jn.00929.2002

V. Villacorta, J. Perkell, and F. Guenther, Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.122, issue.4, pp.2306-2319, 2007.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2773966

E. Macdonald, R. Goldberg, and K. Munhall, Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.127, issue.2, pp.1059-1068, 2010.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3278606

T. Caudrelier, P. Perrier, J. Schwartz, and A. Rochet-capellan, Does Auditory-Motor Learning of Speech Transfer from the CV Syllable to the CVCV Word?, Interspeech 2016, pp.2095-2099, 2016.
DOI : 10.21437/Interspeech.2016-262

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01391406

A. Rochet-capellan and D. Ostry, Simultaneous Acquisition of Multiple Auditory-Motor Transformations in Speech, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.31, issue.7, pp.2657-2662, 2011.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6020-10.2011

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00743779

J. Houde and M. Jordan, Sensorimotor Adaptation in Speech Production, Science, vol.279, issue.5354, pp.1213-1216, 1998.
DOI : 10.1126/science.279.5354.1213

S. Cai, S. Ghosh, F. Guenther, and J. Perkell, Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.128, issue.4, pp.2033-2081, 2010.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3479539

E. Macdonald, D. Purcell, and K. Munhall, Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.129, issue.2, pp.955-965, 2011.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3531932

D. Lametti, S. Nasir, and D. Ostry, Sensory Preference in Speech Production Revealed by Simultaneous Alteration of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.32, issue.27, pp.9351-9358, 2012.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0404-12.2012

A. Yates, Delayed Auditory Feedback and Shadowing, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.1, issue.2, pp.125-131, 1965.
DOI : 10.1016/0005-7967(63)90013-5

J. Perkell, H. Lane, S. Ghosh, and M. Matthies, Mechanisms of vowel production: auditory goals and speaker acuity, Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on speech production, pp.29-32, 2008.

A. Haith, C. Jackson, R. Miall, and S. Vijayakumar, Unifying the sensory and motor components of sensorimotor adaptation, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp.593-600, 2009.

S. Ito, M. Darainy, M. Sasaki, and D. Ostry, Computational model of motor learning and perceptual change, Biological Cybernetics, vol.269, issue.5232, pp.653-667, 2013.
DOI : 10.1126/science.7569931

W. Schuerman, A. Meyer, and J. Mcqueen, Mapping the Speech Code: Cortical Responses Linking the Perception and Production of Vowels, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol.13, p.28439232, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.001

M. Lindau, Vowel features, Language, pp.541-563, 1978.

G. Fant, Feature analysis of Swedish vowels?a revisit, KTH, STL-QPSR, pp.2-3, 1983.

D. Kleinschmidt and T. Jaeger, A Bayesian belief updating model of phonetic recalibration and selective adaptation, 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, pp.10-19, 2011.

S. Katseff, J. Houde, and K. Johnson, Partial compensation for altered auditory feedback: a tradeoff with somatosensory feedback? Language and Speech, pp.295-308, 2012.

F. Robinson, C. Noto, and S. Bevans, Effect of Visual Error Size on Saccade Adaptation in Monkey, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.90, issue.2, pp.1235-1279, 2002.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03328664

K. Wei and K. Körding, Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation?, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.101, issue.2, pp.655-664, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5

S. Sober and M. Brainard, Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.1016, issue.1, pp.21099-103, 2012.
DOI : 10.1196/annals.1298.031

R. Hahnloser and G. Narula, A Bayesian Account of Vocal Adaptation to Pitch-Shifted Auditory Feedback, PLOS ONE, vol.119, issue.1, pp.1-13, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0169795.t001

W. Schuerman, S. Nagarajan, J. Mcqueen, and J. Houde, Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.141, issue.4, pp.2693-2704, 2017.
DOI : 10.1121/1.4979791

J. Houde, S. Nagarajan, K. Sekihara, and M. Merzenich, Modulation of the Auditory Cortex during Speech: An MEG Study, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.95, issue.8, pp.1125-1138, 2002.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1589767

E. Golfinopoulos, J. Tourville, J. Bohland, S. Ghosh, A. Nieto-castanon et al., fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech, NeuroImage, vol.55, issue.3, pp.1324-1338, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.065

S. Eliades and X. Wang, Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex, Nature, vol.85, issue.7198, pp.1102-1106, 2008.
DOI : 10.1044/jshd.3704.476

I. Christoffels, E. Formisano, and N. Schiller, Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech, Human Brain Mapping, vol.60, issue.9, pp.868-879, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/mrm.1910330508

Y. Hashimoto and K. Sakai, Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: An fMRI study, Human Brain Mapping, vol.60, issue.1, pp.22-28, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/hbm.10119

C. Fu, G. Vythelingum, M. Brammer, S. Williams, E. Amaro et al., An fMRI Study of Verbal Self-monitoring: Neural Correlates of Auditory Verbal Feedback, Cerebral Cortex, vol.16, issue.7, pp.969-977, 2006.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1589767

J. Tourville, K. Reilly, and F. Guenther, Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech, NeuroImage, vol.39, issue.3, pp.1429-1443, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054

Z. Zheng, K. Munhall, and I. Johnsrude, Functional Overlap between Regions Involved in Speech Perception and in Monitoring One's Own Voice during Speech Production, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.26, issue.8, pp.1770-1781, 2010.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1589767

M. Barnaud, J. Diard, P. Bessière, and J. Schwartz, Computational simulations of perceptuo-motor idiosyncrasies support the involvement of motor knowledge in speech perception, Brain and Language. Forthcoming