Designing an interdisciplinary laboratory to tackle governance foundations

Muriel Mambrini-Doudet (1) , Elsa Berthet (2) , Paris Chrysos (3) , Claude Didry (4) , Anne-Françoise Schmid

1 CODIR - Collège de Direction
2 SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires
3 Business School
4 CMH - Centre Maurice Halbwachs

The formal landscape of governance studies is obscure although governance has become a self-understanding practice in very discrepant fields. Our assumption is that governance relies on micro-foundations not captured through disciplinary procedures, which are better shaped for macro-foundations. We propose an interdisciplinary method mixing indirect approach and epistemic rigor. We chose as experimental field the ecosystem of science management, because i) it is one of the most ancient enterprise practicing governance and ii) each member of our team could provide the knowledge of actors, practitioners, managers and scholars using the same experimental device. We built a transient interdisciplinary laboratory using procedures offered by a new epistemic proposal, which opens the disciplinary fields on a generic space and allows the combination of different sources of knowledge with high rigor. In short, governance is considered as an integrative object encompassing a large diversity of dimensions. It is studied using a dynamic matrix crossing sources of knowledge corresponding to the dimensions (variables) with drivers of knowledge exchange (index) within a working community. We defined the minimal model for governance as the ratio of orchestration of collective organization over dynamic knowledge puzzling. We built the matrix with, as variables, the discrepant postures within the ecosystem of scientific knowledge production and as index the epistemic tools best linked to the two terms of the model namely discipline democracy and machinery for knowledge exchange. Each of the authors of the present article filled in the matrix, the cells provided then the scientific data to be processed in our interdisciplinary laboratory. The results are so far the precise description for governance of i) a model, ii) a style and iii) micro-foundations. All together they highlight the landscape in which searching for theories and give the interdisciplinary background as well as impulses to eventually design new ones.

Bien que la notion de la gouvernance est de plus en plus utilisée dans des contextes divers, le paysage formel des études sur cette notion reste obscur. Notre hypothèse est que la gouvernance repose sur des micro-fondations, ces derniers n’étant pas saisies par les procédures disciplinaires. Nous proposons une méthode interdisciplinaire qui combine à la fois une approche indirecte et une rigueur épistémique. Nous choisissons le champ de la gestion des sciences pour mener notre expérience car i) il s’agit d’une des pratiques de gouvernance d’entreprise les plus anciennes et ii) ce champ se prête à ce que tous les membres de notre équipe contribuent avec des savoirs sur les praticiens, les managers et les chercheurs de tels dispositifs. Le résultat de ce travail consiste à une description précise de la gouvernance i) d’un modèle, ii) d’un style et ii) des micro-fondations. Ensemble, ces éléments fournissent les grandes lignes d’un paysage des théories de la gouvernance interdisciplinaire.

Mots clés: governance; epistemology; interdisciplinarity

Domaines: Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Muriel Mambrini-Doudet, Elsa Berthet, Paris Chrysos, Claude Didry, Anne-Françoise Schmid. Designing an interdisciplinary laboratory to tackle governance foundations. 16. EURAM Annual Conference. Manageable Cooperation?, Jun 2016, Paris, France. ⟨hal-01694177⟩