M. Adami, B. F. Rudorff, R. M. Freitas, D. A. Aguiar, L. M. Sugawara et al., Remote Sensing Time Series to Evaluate Direct Land Use Change of Recent Expanded Sugarcane Crop in Brazil, Sustainability, vol.3, issue.12, pp.574-58510, 2012.
DOI : 10.3390/rs3010185

A. A. Alencar, P. M. Brando, G. P. Asner, and F. E. Putz, Landscape fragmentation, severe drought, and the new Amazon forest fire regime, Ecological Applications, vol.25, issue.6, pp.1493-1505, 2015.
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/014002

S. Andrade-de-sá, C. Palmer, and S. Di-falco, Dynamics of indirect land-use change: Empirical evidence from Brazil, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.65, issue.3, pp.377-393, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.01.001

A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz, Rethinking the Causes of Deforestation: Lessons from Economic Models, The World Bank Research Observer, vol.14, issue.1, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/wbro/14.1.73

J. L. Arcand, P. Guillaumont, and S. G. Jeanneney, Deforestation and the real exchange rate, Journal of Development Economics, vol.86, issue.2, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.02.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00274384

M. Arellano, On the testing of correlated effects with panel data, Journal of Econometrics, vol.59, issue.1-2, pp.87-9710, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90040-C

J. Hargrave and K. Kis-katos, Economic Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Panel Data Analysis for the 2000s, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.126, issue.1, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005

E. Y. Arima, P. Richards, R. Walker, and M. M. Caldas, Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon, Environmental Research Letters, vol.6, issue.2, pp.1748-9326, 2011.
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010

C. Arndt, R. Benfica, F. Tarp, J. Thurlow, and R. Uaiene, Biofuels, poverty, and growth: a computable general equilibrium analysis of Mozambique, Environment and Development Economics, vol.37, issue.01, pp.81-105, 2010.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024214812527

E. Barona, N. Ramankutty, G. Hyman, and O. T. Coomes, The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon, Environmental Research Letters, vol.5, issue.2, pp.1748-9326, 2010.
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002

B. Global, Statistical Review of World Energy [WWW Document]. URL http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-worldenergy .html, 2015.

C. Castiblanco, A. Etter, and T. M. Aide, Oil palm plantations in Colombia: a model of future expansion, Environmental Science & Policy, vol.27, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.003

J. Choumert, C. Motel, P. Dakpo, and H. K. , Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature, Ecological Economics, vol.90, pp.19-28, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.016
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00806629

J. Choumert, P. Combes-motel, and C. Guegang, The biofuel-development-nexus: A metaanalysis, Études et Documents, vol.9, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01512678

D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, P. Berrisford, P. Poli et al., The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.91, issue.656, pp.553-597, 2011.
DOI : 10.1175/2008MWR2781.1

M. P. Ferreira, D. S. Alves, and Y. E. Shimabukuro, Forest dynamics and land-use transitions in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: the case of sugarcane expansion, Regional Environmental Change, vol.32, issue.3, pp.365-377, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.017

G. M. Grossman and A. B. Krueger, Economic Growth and the Environment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.110, issue.2, pp.353-377, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/2118443

M. Hansen, P. Potapov, B. Margono, S. Stehman, S. Turubanova et al., Response to Comment on "High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change", Science, vol.8, issue.6160, 2014.
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044039

M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova et al., High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science, vol.2, issue.5583, pp.850-853, 2013.
DOI : 10.4155/cmt.11.18

A. R. Keeley and Y. Ikeda, Determinants of foreign direct investment in wind energy in developing countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.161, pp.1451-1458, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.106

R. J. Keenan, G. A. Reams, F. Achard, J. V. De-freitas, A. Grainger et al., Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment, 2015.

D. M. Lapola, R. Schaldach, J. Alcamo, A. Bondeau, J. Koch et al., Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.85, issue.3, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00187-6

A. Leblois, O. Damette, and J. Wolbersberger, What has Driven Deforestation in Developing Countries Since the 2000s? Evidence from New Remote-Sensing Data. Word Dev, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01487100

N. L. Panwar, S. C. Kaushik, and S. Kothari, Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.15, issue.3, pp.1513-1524, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037

A. S. Pfaff, What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?: Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.37, pp.26-43, 1999.
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-1772

P. D. Richards, R. J. Myers, S. M. Swinton, and R. T. Walker, Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America, Global Environmental Change, vol.22, issue.2, pp.454-462, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004

O. Santoni, Country-level Climate database, 1901.

T. Searchinger, R. Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid et al., Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change, Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change, pp.1238-1240, 2008.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1152747

J. O. Sexton, P. Noojipady, X. Song, M. Feng, D. Song et al., Conservation policy and the measurement of??forests, Nature Climate Change, vol.2, pp.192-19610, 1038.
DOI : 10.14358/PERS.81.7.521

G. Sorda, M. Banse, and C. Kemfert, An overview of biofuel policies across the world, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.11, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.066

P. Tait, C. Saunders, M. Guenther, and P. Rutherford, Emerging versus developed economy consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable food production: a choice experiment approach comparing Indian, Chinese and United Kingdom lamb consumers, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.124, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.088

R. Tropek, O. Sedlá?ek, J. Beck, P. Keil, Z. Musilová et al., Comment on "High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change", Science, vol.87, issue.8, pp.981-981, 2014.
DOI : 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1877:MBDICL]2.0.CO;2

J. R. Vincent, R. T. Carson, J. R. Deshazo, K. A. Schwabe, I. Ahmad et al., Tropical countries may be willing to pay more to protect their forests, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.7, issue.29, 2014.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1015575517927
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/111/28/10113.full.pdf

S. Wianwiwat and J. Asafu-adjaye, Is there a role for biofuels in promoting energy self sufficiency and security? A CGE analysis of biofuel policy in Thailand. Energy Policy, Special section: Long Run Transitions to Sustainable Economic Structures in the European Union and Beyond 55, pp.543-555, 2013.

W. Bank, World Development Indicators [WWW Document]. URL http://data.worldbank.org/indicator, SP.POP.TOTL, 2015.

A. Albania, *. Albania, *. Albania, *. Albania, *. Albania et al., Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Burundi Burundi Burundi Cambodia Cambodia Cambodia Cambodia Cambodia Cameroon Cameroon Cameroon Cameroon Cameroon Central African Republic Central African Republic Central African Republic Central African Republic Central African Republic Chad China* China* China* China* Colombia* Colombia* Colombia* Colombia* Colombia, Congo Congo Congo Congo Congo Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep

C. Rica, *. Costa-rica, *. Costa-rica, *. Costa-rica, *. Costa-rica et al., * Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Paraguay* Paraguay* Paraguay* Paraguay* Paraguay* Peru* Peru* Peru* Peru* Peru* Philippines Philippines Philippines Philippines Philippines Romania* Romania* Romania* Romania Romania* Russia* Russia* Russia* Russia* Russia* Rwanda Rwanda Rwanda Senegal Senegal Serbia* Serbia* Serbia* Serbia* Serbia* Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa* South Africa* Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Suriname* Suriname* Suriname* Suriname* Suriname* Swaziland Swaziland Swaziland Swaziland Syria Tableau 12 ? Additional specification: ethanol production after 2006 in UMICs Variables Forestloss10% Restrained sample Forestloss10% Forestloss30% Forestloss50% Forestloss75% log(ethanol+1) 0, ) (2.33)** (2.19)** (1.84)* (2.03)** log.29) (1.92)* (1.88)* (1.71)* (2.47)**)*** (2.36)** (2.25)** (2.18)** (1.96)* log)** (2.27)** (2.28)** (2.30)** (3.08)*** log