Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Characterisation and Complexity

Abstract : Different agents may have different points of view. Following a popular approach in the artificial intelligence literature, this can be modelled by means of different abstract argu-mentation frameworks, each consisting of a set of arguments the agent is contemplating and a binary attack-relation between them. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a profile of argumentation frameworks is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combination of, first, some basic factual attack-relation between the arguments and, second, the personal preferences of the agent concerned regarding the moral or social values the arguments under scrutiny relate to. We treat this question of rationalisability of a profile as an algorithmic problem and identify tractable and intractable cases. In doing so, we distinguish different constraints on admissible rationalisations, e.g., concerning the types of preferences used or the number of distinct values involved. We also distinguish two different semantics for rationalisability, which differ in the assumptions made on how agents treat attacks between arguments they do not report. This research agenda, bringing together ideas from abstract argumentation and social choice, is useful for understanding what types of profiles can reasonably be expected to occur in a multiagent system.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [38 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01617015
Contributor : Nicolas Maudet <>
Submitted on : Sunday, October 15, 2017 - 11:13:00 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - 3:50:31 AM
Long-term archiving on : Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 12:45:10 PM

File

argratjair-final.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01617015, version 1

Citation

Stéphane Airiau, Elise Bonzon, Ulle Endriss, Nicolas Maudet, Julien Rossit. Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Characterisation and Complexity. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 60, pp.149 - 177. ⟨hal-01617015⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

218

Files downloads

231