Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Reproductive BioMedicine Online Année : 2017

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology?

Résumé

A strong correlation between blastocyst morphology and implantation has been shown by many studies. The consequences and effects of assisted reproductive techniques on children's short and long-term health have always been a source of discussion. The obstetric and perinatal outcome of singletons according to blastocyst morphology has rarely been evaluated. The aim of this observational study is to determine whether a relationship exists between blastocyst morphology and obstetric and perinatal outcomes. A total of 799 singleton clinical pregnancies were analysed after transfer of a single fresh blastocyst on day 5 between 2006 and 2013. Blastocysts were divided into four groups based on their morphology on day 5: group 1 = good morphology blastocysts; group 2 = fair morphology blastocysts; group 3 = poor morphology blastocysts and group 4 = early (B1/B2) blastocysts. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared between the four groups. After adjustment for some confounding variables, main obstetric and perinatal outcomes after transfer of blastocysts with poor morphological characteristics were not associated with increased adverse obstetric and perinatal events. Sex ratio was significantly higher in group 1 compared with groups 2, 3 and 4, and in Group 2 compared with Group 3 (P < 0.001) even after adjustment (P < 0.05).

Dates et versions

hal-01605673 , version 1 (02-10-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Céline Bouillon, Noémie Celton, Sandra Kassem, Cynthia Frapsauce, Fabrice Guerif. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2017, 35 (2), pp.197-207. ⟨10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.009⟩. ⟨hal-01605673⟩
66 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More