W. G. Astley and P. S. Sachdeva, Structural Sources of Intraorganizational: Power: A Theoretical Synthesis, Academy of Management Review, vol.9, issue.1, pp.104-113, 1984.

P. Bachrach and M. S. Baratz, Two faces of power. American political science review, pp.947-952, 1962.
DOI : 10.2307/1952796

C. Baden-fuller and M. Pitt, Strategic innovation How interorganizational networks can become pathdependent: Bargaining practices in the photonics industry, Schmalenbach Business Review, vol.66, pp.73-99, 1996.

P. R. Carlile, Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries, Organization Science, vol.15, issue.5, pp.555-568, 2004.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094

R. B. Collier and D. Collier, Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America, 1991.

P. A. David, Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, vol.75, issue.2, pp.332-337, 1985.

M. Dijk and M. Yarime, The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.77, issue.8, pp.77-1371, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.001

R. Garud and M. A. Rappa, A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants, Organization Science, vol.5, issue.3, pp.344-362, 1994.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.5.3.344

R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe, Path dependence or path creation, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x/pdf

F. W. Geels, Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, 2005.
DOI : 10.4337/9781845424596

C. Hardy, Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change, British Journal of Management, vol.43, issue.3, pp.3-16, 1996.
DOI : 10.1108/eb054273

C. Hardy and D. Dougherty, Powering product innovation, European Management Journal, vol.15, issue.1, pp.16-27, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0263-2373(96)00070-9

C. Hardy and S. Leiba-o-'sullivan, The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice, Human Relations, vol.30, issue.4, pp.451-483, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x

R. Garud and P. Karnoe, Path dependence and creation, 2001.

R. Garud and P. Karnøe, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.2, pp.277-300, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1000.5216

R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnoe, Path Dependence or Path Creation?, Journal of Management Studies, vol.9, issue.4, pp.760-774, 2010.
DOI : 10.4135/9781849200394.n34
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x/pdf

F. W. Geels, Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.72, issue.6, pp.681-696, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014

J. Goldstone, Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence, and Explanation in Historical Sociology, American Journal of Sociology, vol.104, issue.3, pp.829-845, 1998.
DOI : 10.1086/210088

C. Hardy, Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change, British Journal of Management, vol.43, issue.3, pp.3-16, 1996.
DOI : 10.1108/eb054273

C. Hardy and D. Dougherty, Powering product innovation, European Management Journal, vol.15, issue.1, pp.16-27, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0263-2373(96)00070-9

C. Hardy and S. Leiba-o-'sullivan, The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice, Human Relations, vol.30, issue.4, pp.451-483, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x
URL : http://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/11343/116092/4/36-EMPOWERMENT.pdf

A. Hargadon and R. I. Sutton, Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, pp.716-749, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/2393655

S. A. Kauffman, The origins of order: Self-organisation and selection in evolution, 1993.

A. Kay, A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies, Public Administration, vol.14, issue.3, pp.553-571, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/0018-2656.00093

D. Krackhardt, Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, issue.2, pp.342-369, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2393394

M. B. Lieberman and S. Asaba, WHY DO FIRMS IMITATE EACH OTHER?, Academy of Management Review, vol.31, issue.2, pp.31-366, 2006.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208686
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.145.9911

S. J. Liebowitz and S. E. Margolis, Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.1, issue.11, pp.205-226, 1995.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1706450

S. Lukes, Power: A Radical View, 1974.

J. Mahoney, Path dependence in historical sociology, Theory and Society, vol.29, issue.4, pp.507-548, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007113830879

U. Meyer and C. Schubert, Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. The role of agency and institutions in the stabilisation of technological innovations, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, vol.3, issue.1, pp.23-44, 2007.

P. Pierson, Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics, American Political Science Review, vol.12, issue.02, pp.251-267, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/1953498

T. J. Pinch, W. E. Bijker, and J. Pfeffer, The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology Who gets power?and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power, Organizational dynamics, vol.5, issue.3, pp.3-21, 1978.

G. Schreyögg and J. Sydow, Understanding institutional and organizational path dependencies, in The hidden dynamics of path dependence: institutions and organizations, pp.1251-1262, 2010.

C. Schubert, J. Sydow, and A. Windeler, The means of managing momentum: Bridging technological paths and organisational fields, Research Policy, vol.42, issue.8, pp.42-1389, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.004

J. Sydow, G. Schreyögg, and J. Koch, ORGANIZATIONAL PATH DEPENDENCE: OPENING THE BLACK BOX., Academy of Management Review, vol.34, issue.4, pp.689-709, 2009.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978

J. Sydow, A. Windeler, G. Müller-seitz, and K. Lange, Path Constitution Analysis: A Methodology for Understanding Path Dependence and Path Creation, Business Research, vol.26, issue.1, pp.155-1176, 2012.
DOI : 10.2307/2392599
URL : http://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDOCS_derivate_000000003660/sydow-et-al-path-dependence.pdf

J. Sydow, A. Windeler, C. Schubert, and G. Möllering, Organizing R&D Consortia for Path Creation and Extension: The Case of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies, Organization Studies, vol.22, issue.6, pp.33-907, 2012.
DOI : 10.1177/0170840601226006

J. Van-den-ende, G. Van-de-kaa, S. Den-uijl, and H. J. De-vries, The Paradox of Standard Flexibility: The Effects of Co-evolution between Standard and Interorganizational Network, Organization Studies, vol.28, issue.2, pp.5-6, 2012.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.1

J. Vergne and R. Durand, The Missing Link Between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications, Journal of Management Studies, vol.24, issue.4, pp.736-759, 2010.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537077

M. Willinger and E. Zuscovitch, Efficience, irréversibilités et constitution des technologies. Revue d'économie industrielle, pp.7-22, 1993.
DOI : 10.3406/rei.1993.1485