Idiosyncratic Deals from a Distributive Justice Perspective: Examining Co-workers' Voice Behavior

Abstract : This study focuses on a third-party perspective of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). More specifically, we look into the differential judgments co-workers make about i-deals in their work environment, as well as their reactions. Based on equity theory, we examine to what extent the content of the i-deal and the work context (i.e., the functional dependence between co-worker and i-dealer) explain co-worker judgments regarding i-deal fairness in addition to subsequent voice behavior (i.e., complaining and/or requesting compensation). A vignette study with 1988 respondents shows that when i-deals are considered distributively unfair, co-workers try to restore equity through voice behavior, thereby making the i-deal less effective. Furthermore, i-deals spark more distributive injustice perceptions and voice behavior in a highly interdependent work context. Finally, on average, financial bonuses were considered most distributively unfair and, thus, trigger more voice behavior. These results have important implications for i-deal literature as they uncover the criteria that co-workers use to judge i-deals and shape their reactions.
Document type :
Journal articles
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01562979
Contributor : Romain Boisselet <>
Submitted on : Monday, July 17, 2017 - 11:31:37 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, April 11, 2019 - 9:25:01 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Sophie De Winne, Luc Sels, Elise Marescaux. Idiosyncratic Deals from a Distributive Justice Perspective: Examining Co-workers' Voice Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, Springer Verlag, 2017, pp.1-19. ⟨10.1007/s10551-016-3400-7⟩. ⟨hal-01562979⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

132