Frontier-based vs. traditional mutual fund ratings: A first backtesting analysis

Olivier Brandouy 1 Kristiaan Kerstens 2, 3 Ignace Van Woestyne
1 Sorbonne Graduate Business School
2 Department of Economics
3 LEM - Lille - Economie et Management
Abstract : We explore the potential benefits of a series of existing and new non-parametric convex and non-convex frontier-based fund rating models to summarize the information contained in the moments of the mutual fund price series. Limiting ourselves to the traditional mean-variance portfolio setting, we test in a simple backtesting setup whether these efficiency measures fare any better than more traditional financial performance measures in selecting promising investment opportunities. The evidence points to a remarkable superior performance of these frontier models compared to most, but not all traditional financial performance measures.
Keywords : Mutual fund rating DEA FDH Shortage function Mean-variance portfolio frontier
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, 2015, 242 (1), pp.332--342. 〈10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.010〉
Liste complète des métadonnées
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01533555
Contributeur : Romain Boisselet <>
Soumis le : mardi 6 juin 2017 - 15:44:30
Dernière modification le : jeudi 7 février 2019 - 14:53:38

Identifiants

Collections

LEM_LILLE | UNIV-LILLE | IAEPARIS

Citation

Olivier Brandouy, Kristiaan Kerstens, Ignace Van Woestyne. Frontier-based vs. traditional mutual fund ratings: A first backtesting analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, 2015, 242 (1), pp.332--342. 〈10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.010〉. 〈hal-01533555〉

Exporter

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

109

Contact

support.ccsd.cnrs.fr
hal.support@ccsd.cnrs.fr
Logo CCSD