Exploring cost dominance in crop farming systems between high and low pesticide use

Jean-Philippe Boussemart 1, 2, 3 Herve Leleu 4, 3 Oluwaseun Ojo 3
1 UFR MIME - UFR de Mathématiques, Informatique, Management, Economie
2 IESEG - School of Management
3 LEM - Lille économie management - LEM - UMR 9221
4 Economy
Abstract : The purpose of this paper is to assess cost dominance in direct inputs between arable crop-based systems using low or high pesticide levels per hectare. Our investigation departs from a traditional efficiency analysis and aims at comparing two minimal direct cost functions excluding pesticide expenses. This means that we evaluate the gap between two efficient frontiers instead of focusing on individual farm inefficiency scores. Our only objective is to compare two optimal cost benchmarks for systems respectively defined with high or low pesticide levels per hectare by varying their scale and output mix. A robust approach frontier is introduced to control the influence of potential outliers and unobserved heterogeneity. Based on 707 French crop farms observed in 2008, our simulations show that agricultural practices using less pesticide per hectare are unambiguously more cost-competitive in terms of direct inputs while inducing no other substitution costs. This cost dominance is a robust phenomenon regardless of the size and scope of crop activities, which supports more ecofriendly practices.
Keywords : Pesticide use (PU) Arable crops farming systems Activity analysis model (AAM) Non parametric robust cost function (NPRCF) Hamming distance (HD)
Document type :
Journal articles
Liste complète des métadonnées
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01533552
Contributor : Romain Boisselet <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, June 6, 2017 - 3:44:27 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, April 11, 2019 - 9:25:01 AM

Identifiers

Collections

LEM_LILLE | UNIV-LILLE3 | UNIV-LILLE

Citation

Jean-Philippe Boussemart, Herve Leleu, Oluwaseun Ojo. Exploring cost dominance in crop farming systems between high and low pesticide use. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer Verlag, 2015, 45 (2), pp.197--214. ⟨10.1007/s11123-015-0443-1⟩. ⟨hal-01533552⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

201

Contact

support.ccsd.cnrs.fr
hal.support@ccsd.cnrs.fr
Logo CCSD