O. Scheuer, F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, and B. Mclaren, Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol.46, issue.1, pp.43-102, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x

F. Toni and P. Torroni, Bottom-Up Argumentation, Proc. of TAFA'11, pp.249-262, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_16
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.221.2018

P. E. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge, Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.2, pp.457-486, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005

D. Kontarinis, E. Bonzon, N. Maudet, and P. Moraitis, Picking the right expert to make a debate uncontroversial, Proc. of COMMA'12, pp.486-497, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00752451

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

S. Coste-marquis, S. Konieczny, P. Marquis, and M. Ouali, Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks, Proc. of KR'12, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00866890

J. Leite and J. Martins, Social abstract argumentation, Proc. of IJCAI'11, pp.2287-2292, 2011.

S. Egilmez, J. Martins, and J. Leite, Extending Social Abstract Argumentation with Votes on Attacks, pp.16-31, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9_2

E. Bonzon and N. Maudet, On the Outcomes of Multiparty Persuasion, Proc. of AAMAS'11, pp.47-54, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01273221

H. Prakken, Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.15, issue.6, pp.347-376, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exi046
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.66.2429

G. Boella, D. Gabbay, A. Perotti, L. Van-der-torre, and S. Villata, Conditional Labelling for Abstract Argumentation, Proc. of TAFA'11, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_15
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.422.8546

D. Kontarinis, E. Bonzon, N. Maudet, and P. Moraitis, On the use of target sets for move selection in multi-agent debates, Proc. of ECAI'14, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01523777

I. Rahwan, K. Larson, and F. Tohmé, A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics, Proc. of IJCAI'09, pp.251-256, 2009.

M. Caminada, Truth, lies and bullshit; distinguishing classes of dishonesty, Proc. of SS@IJCAI'09, pp.39-50, 2009.

C. Sakama, Dishonest arguments in debate games, Proc. of COMMA'12, pp.177-184, 2012.

S. Coste-marquis, C. Devred, S. Konieczny, M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, and P. Marquis, On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.10-15, pp.740-753, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012