P. Baroni, M. Caminada, and M. Giacomin, An introduction to argumentation semantics, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.93, issue.04, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_2

R. Baumann, What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation, Proc. ECAI'12, pp.127-132, 2012.

P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Herzig, Encoding Argument Graphs in Logic, Proc. IPMU'14, pp.345-354, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_35
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01147220

E. Bonzon, J. Delobelle, S. Konieczny, and N. Maudet, A comparative study of rankingbased semantics for abstract argumentation, Proc. AAAI'16, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01263996

S. Coste-marquis, S. Konieczny, J. Mailly, and P. Marquis, On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments statuses, Proc. KR'14, 2014.

S. Doutre, A. Herzig, and L. Perrussel, A dynamic logic framework for abstract argumentation, Proc. KR'14, pp.62-71, 2014.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

W. Dvo?ák and C. Spanring, Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics, Journal of Logic and Computation, 2016.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exw008

H. Katsuno and A. O. Mendelzon, Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change, Artificial Intelligence, vol.52, issue.3, pp.263-294, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90069-V