Quantifying the Difference between Argumentation Semantic

Sylvie Doutre (1, 2) , Jean-Guy Mailly (3)

1 IRIT-LILaC - Logique, Interaction, Langue et Calcul
2 UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole
3 Institute of Information Systems

Properties of argumentation semantics have been widely studied in the last decades. However, there has been no investigation on the question of difference measures between semantics. Such measures turn helpful when the semantics associated to an argumentation framework may have to be changed, in a way that ensures that the new semantics is not too dissimilar from the old one. Three main notions of difference measures between semantics are defined in this paper. Some of these measures are shown to be distances or semi-distances.

Mots clés: Abstract argumentation; Extension-based semantics

Domaines: Intelligence artificielle [cs.AI]; Apprentissage [cs.LG]; Logique en informatique [cs.LO]; Informatique et langage [cs.CL]

Sylvie Doutre, Jean-Guy Mailly. Quantifying the Difference between Argumentation Semantic. 6th International Conference on Computational models of argument (COMMA 2016), Sep 2016, Potsdam, Germany. pp. 255-262. ⟨hal-01500509⟩