K. Aijmer, Conversational routines in English: convention and creativity, 1996.

H. Boas, A constructional approach to resultatives, 2003.

R. Boogaart, Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar, Contexts and constructions, pp.213-254, 2009.
DOI : 10.1075/cal.9.09boo

R. Boogaart and E. Fortuin, To appear. Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood

J. K. Boyd and A. E. Goldberg, Learning What <b>NOT</b> to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in <i>A</i>-Adjective Production, Language, vol.87, issue.1, pp.55-83, 2011.
DOI : 10.1353/lan.2011.0012

P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language usage, 1987.

J. Bybee, From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition, Language, vol.82, issue.4, pp.711-733, 2006.
DOI : 10.1353/lan.2006.0186

B. Cappelle, 9. Conventional combinations in pockets of productivity: English resultatives and Dutch ditransitives expressing excess, Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, pp.251-282
DOI : 10.1515/9783110366273.251

B. Cappelle, To appear. What's pragmatics doing outside constructions? Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line

R. Carston, The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication, International Review of Pragmatics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.35-62, 2009.
DOI : 10.1163/187731009X455839

M. Davies, The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990- present, 2008.

R. Declerck and S. Reed, Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis, 2001.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110851748

I. Depraetere and S. Reed, Towards a More Explicit Taxonomy of Root Possibility in English " . Paper presented at ISLE 1, pp.8-11, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00625743

I. Depraetere and S. Reed, Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility, English Language and Linguistics, vol.12, issue.01, pp.1-29, 2011.
DOI : 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00625743

I. Depraetere, Some observations on the meaning of modals, Distinctions in English Grammar, Offered to Renaat Declerck. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp.72-91, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00603178

I. Depraetere, Modals and lexically-regulated saturation, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.71, pp.160-177, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.003

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01083051

I. Depraetere and R. Salkie, To appear. Saturation, free pragmatic enrichment, completion and expansion: a view from linguistics Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line

C. J. Fillmore, P. Kay, M. Catherine, and O. Connor, Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone, Language, vol.64, issue.3, pp.501-538, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/414531

C. J. Fillmore, R. Lee-goldman, and R. Rhodes, The FrameNet Constructicon, Sign-based Construction Grammar, pp.283-299, 2012.

A. E. Goldberg, Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure, 1995.

A. E. Goldberg, Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language, 2006.

D. Gordon and G. Lakoff, Conversational Postulates. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.63-84, 1971.

G. Green and M. N. , Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, 2012.

H. Grice and . Paul, Logic and conversation, Syntax and Semantics, pp.41-58, 1975.

S. Gries and A. Stefanowitsch, Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations', International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol.9, issue.1, pp.31-61, 2004.
DOI : 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.10.573

M. Groefsema, Can, may, must and should: A Relevance theoretic account, Journal of Linguistics, vol.266, issue.01, pp.53-79, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00353453

M. Hilpert, Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-based Approach to Grammaticalization, 2008.
DOI : 10.1075/cal.7

M. Hilpert, Construction Grammar and its Application to English, 2014.

M. Hilpert, Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may, 2016.

R. Jackendoff, Twistin' the Night Away, Language, vol.73, issue.3, pp.534-559, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/415883

G. Lakoff, Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind, 1987.

G. Leech, The Pragmatics of Politeness, 1983.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001

B. Mcgregor, Linguistics: An Introduction, 2015.

L. A. Michaelis and K. Lambrecht, Toward a Construction-Based Theory of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition, Language, vol.72, issue.2, pp.215-247, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/416650

K. Mitchell, Semantic ascent, intersubjectivty and In: Raphael Salkie,Pierre Busuttil,Johan van der Auwera. Modality in English: Theory and Description, pp.55-78, 2009.

J. L. Morgan, Two types of convention in indirect speech acts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https, 1977.

F. R. Palmer, Modality and the English Modals (second edition), 1990.

A. Papafragou, Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface, 2000.

F. Perek, Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-Based Perspectives, 2015.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110274844

H. Schmid and H. Küchenhoff, Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.24, issue.3, pp.531-577, 2013.
DOI : 10.1515/cog-2013-0018

J. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, 1969.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139173438

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, (second edition) Relevance: communication and cognition, 1995.

A. Stefanowitsch, S. Th, and . Gries, Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol.8, issue.2, pp.209-243, 2003.
DOI : 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste

E. Traugott and . Closs, Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? This issue, 2016.

J. Verstraete and S. D. , A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch, Studies in Language, vol.36, issue.1, pp.123-153
DOI : 10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver

A. Wärnsby, On the adequacy of a constructionist approach to modality, this issue. Watts, 2003.

A. M. Zwicky and J. M. Sadock, Ambiguity tests and how to tail them, Syntax and Semantics, vol.4, pp.1-36, 1975.