Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency

Abstract : Prior research has purported to show that words with infrequent phoneme-grapheme correspondences are more difficult to spell than words with frequent phoneme-grapheme correspondences. Defining exactly what a phoneme-grapheme relationship is, however, is not necessarily straightforward. There are a number of different assumptions that can be made. In this study, we developed four metrics of sound-spelling contingency based on all monosyllabic English words, including those with complex morphology. These metrics differed in the extent to which they included assumptions about spelling. The psychological reality of these different metrics was evaluated against data from a large-scale study of skilled adult spelling and a nonword spelling experiment. The results suggest that when spelling, people are sensitive to positional information, morphological status, vowel type, and a number of more idiosyncratic constraints.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01441380
Contributor : Jean-Baptiste Melmi Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, January 19, 2017 - 5:11:39 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:58:52 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

C Perry, J Ziegler, M Coltheart. How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Series a Human Experimental Psychology, SAGE Publications, 2002, 55 (3), pp.897-915. ⟨10.1080/02724980143000640⟩. ⟨hal-01441380⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

154