HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

How we detect logical inconsistencies

Abstract : How do individuals detect inconsistencies? According to the theory described in this article, they search for a possibility represented in a mental model, in which each proposition in a description is true. If they find such a possibility, the description is consistent; otherwise, it is inconsistent. Evidence corroborates the theory. The evaluation of consistency is easy when the first possibility generated from the start of a description fits later propositions in the description; it is harder when this possibility does not fit later propositions, and individuals have to look for an alternative possibility. The theory postulates that models represent what is true, not what is false. As a result, individuals succumb to systematic illusions of consistency and of inconsistency.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Jean-Baptiste Melmi Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, January 19, 2017 - 5:09:43 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:58:52 PM

Links full text




Pn Johnson-Laird, P Legrenzi, V Girotto. How we detect logical inconsistencies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Association for Psychological Science, 2004, 13 (2), pp.41-45. ⟨10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00271.x⟩. ⟨hal-01441298⟩



Record views