Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Efficiency, sensitivity, specificity: A comparison of different reading tests

Abstract : A number of tests have been developed for early screening of difficulties in learning to read. However, little research has compared their performance or their diagnostic abilities. Our study aims to evaluate 6 reading tests (Time2, LUM, words and pseudowords reading subtests from Evalec, the Batelem and a non standardized phonological decoding subtests) by using a standard French reading test (l'Alouette) as a reference test. ROC curves were used for: 1. evaluating and comparing tests based on sensitivity, specificity, weights of evidence and expected weights of evidence and 2. choosing optimal cut-off values. Results show that these tests have good overall performance but they differ in their diagnostic abilities. Strategies are proposed for effectively using these tests in a screening program for second grade children.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01440464
Contributor : Jean-Baptiste Melmi <>
Submitted on : Thursday, January 19, 2017 - 12:00:24 PM
Last modification on : Friday, January 10, 2020 - 3:42:18 PM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01440464, version 1

Collections

Citation

Daisy Bertranrd, Joel Fluss, Catherine Billard, Johannes C. Ziegler. Efficiency, sensitivity, specificity: A comparison of different reading tests. Annee Psychologique, Centre Henri Pieron/Armand Colin, 2010, 110 (2), pp.299-320. ⟨hal-01440464⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

83