HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The psychology of reasoning about preferences and unconsequential decisions

Abstract : People can reason about the preferences of other agents, and predict their behavior based on these preferences. Surprisingly, the psychology of reasoning has long neglected this fact, and focused instead on disinterested inferences, of which preferences are neither an input nor an output. This exclusive focus is untenable, though, as there is mounting evidence that reasoners take into account the preferences of others, at the expense of logic when logic and preferences point to different conclusions. This article summarizes the most recent account of how reasoners predict the behavior and attitude of other agents based on conditional rules describing actions and their consequences, and reports new experimental data about which assumptions reasoners retract when their predictions based on preferences turn out to be false.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01439712
Contributor : Jean-Baptiste Melmi Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - 5:07:25 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:58:52 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Jean-François Bonnefon, Vittorio Girotto, Paolo Legrenzi. The psychology of reasoning about preferences and unconsequential decisions. Synthese, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2012, 185 (1), pp.27-41. ⟨10.1007/s11229-011-9957-x⟩. ⟨hal-01439712⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

49