Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Indexing the indices: scientific publishing needs to undergo a revolution.

Abstract : Funders, institutions and journals should challenge the tyranny of metrics. Editors of international scientific journals find it more and more difficult to locate reviewers that are willing to evaluate manuscripts prior to publication (called ‘peer-review’). The most experienced researchers, best qualified to undertake these evaluations, increasingly decline peer-review requests, either because they do not have time or because they have reviewed so many manuscripts that they have become weary of the task. As a result, editors often have to call upon less experienced researchers or scientists, increasingly from more distant fields, often to the detriment of the quality of the review. So how did we arrive at this impasse, and what can we do to resolve it? The stakes are high, because the reputation of the whole peer-review system used in scientific publishing could be damaged in the long term.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [1 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01438782
Contributor : Editor Jph <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 11:25:24 AM
Last modification on : Friday, July 9, 2021 - 12:02:03 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Wednesday, April 26, 2017 - 1:17:22 PM

File

JPH-3-e009.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Sylvain Delzon, Hervé Cochard, Sebastian Pfautsch. Indexing the indices: scientific publishing needs to undergo a revolution.. Journal of Plant Hydraulics, INRA Science and Impact, 2016, 3 (e-009), pp.e009. ⟨10.20870/jph.2016.e009⟩. ⟨hal-01438782⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

928

Files downloads

536