HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Baboons' Response Speed Is Biased by Their Moods

Abstract : The affect-as-information hypothesis (e.g., Schwarz & Clore, 2003), predicts that the positive or negative valence of our mood differentially affects our processing of the details of the environment. However, this hypothesis has only been tested with mood induction procedures and fairly complex cognitive tasks in humans. Here, six baboons (Papio papio) living in a social group had free access to a computerized visual search task on which they were over-trained. Trials that immediately followed a spontaneously expressed emotional behavior were analyzed, ruling out possible biases due to induction procedures. RTs following negatively valenced behaviors are slower than those following neutral and positively valenced behaviors, respectively. Thus, moods affect the performance of nonhuman primates tested in highly automatized tasks, as it does in humans during tasks with much higher cognitive demands. These findings reveal a presumably universal and adaptive mechanism by which moods influence performance in various ecological contexts.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [23 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Jean-Baptiste Melmi Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, October 1, 2018 - 1:37:59 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:58:54 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Wednesday, January 2, 2019 - 1:58:36 PM


Publication funded by an institution


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License




Yousri Marzouki, Julie Gullstrand, Annabelle Goujon, Joël Fagot. Baboons' Response Speed Is Biased by Their Moods. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2014, 9 (7), ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0102562⟩. ⟨hal-01432481⟩



Record views


Files downloads