P. Boersma and D. Weenink, PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer, p.20, 2015.

A. B?-urki and M. G. Gaskell, Lexical representation of schwa words: Two mackerels, but only one salami, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn, vol.38, pp.617-631, 2012.

A. B?-urki, M. Laganaro, A. , and F. , Phonologically driven variability: The case of determiners, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn, vol.40, pp.1348-1362, 2014.

N. Chater and C. D. Manning, Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition, Trends Cognit. Sci, vol.10, pp.335-344, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006

K. I. Forster and J. C. Forster, DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy, Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput, vol.35, pp.116-124, 2003.
DOI : 10.3758/bf03195503
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03195503.pdf

M. Goldrick, Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence, Lang. Cogn. Process, vol.21, pp.817-855, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/01690960600824112

F. Hinskens, B. Hermans, and M. Van-oostendorp, Grammar or lexicon. Or: Grammar and lexicon? Rule-based and usage-based approaches to phonological variation, Lingua, vol.142, pp.1-26, 2014.

M. Kenstowicz, Phonology in Generative Grammar, 1994.

J. Klausenburger, French Liaison and Linguistic Theory (F, 1984.

M. Miozzo, C. , and A. , The selection of lexical-syntactic features in noun phrase production: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn, vol.25, pp.907-922, 1999.

A. Protopapas, CHECKVOCAL: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX, Behav. Res. Methods, vol.39, pp.859-862, 2007.

K. Spalek, K. Bock, and H. Schriefers, A purple giraffe is faster than a purple elephant: Inconsistent phonology affects determiner selection in English, Cognition, vol.114, pp.123-128, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.011

B. Tranel, Concreteness in Generative Phonology: Evidence from French, 1981.