P. Black and D. Vviliam, Assessment and classroom learning. A ssessrnent in eduoetion, pp.7-74, 1998.

J. Bull and C. Mckenna, A blueprint for computer-assi<.ted assessment, 2003.

J. E. Caldwell, Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips, Cell Biology Education, vol.6, issue.1, pp.9-20, 2007.
DOI : 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205

K. Chanock, Cornments on essays : do students understand what t utors write?, 2000.

M. Ebner, C. Lienhardt, M. Rohs, and I. Meyer, Microblogs in higher education-a chance to facilitate informa! and process-oriented learning ? Cornputer-s ?1 Education, pp.92-100, 2010.

S. A. Gauci, A. M. Dantas, D. A. , and R. E. Kernm, Promoting studentcentered active learning in lectures with a persona! response sy<.tem. Admnces in Physiology Education, pp.60-71, 2009.

J. Hattie and R. , Assessment and classroom learning : A deductive approach. A ssessrnent in Education, pp.111-122, 1998.

R. Higgins, Be mor-e critical : r-ethinking assessrnent feedback, 2000.

R. Higgins, P. Hart, and A. Skelton, The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning, Studies in Higher-Education, pp.53-64, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/11193-000

R. Junco, G. Heiberger, and E. Loken, The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.26, issue.2, pp.119-132, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x

M. Kam, J. Wang, A. Iles, E. Tse, J. Chiu et al., Livenotes, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems , CHI '05, pp.531-540, 2005.
DOI : 10.1145/1054972.1055046

H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon, vVhat is twitter , a social network or a news media, Pmceedings of the 19th international confeTenoe on W odd 1l!ide 1oeb, pp.591-600, 2010.

M. Lea, Computer Conferencing and Assessment: New ways of writing in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, vol.26, issue.2, pp.163-181, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/004839318101100305

T. Miller, Formative computer-based assessment in higher education : the effectiveness of feedba.ck in supporting &tudent learning. Assessment ?1 Evaluation in HigheT Education, pp.181-192, 2009.

D. J. Nicol and J. T. Boyle, P eer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes : a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom, Studies in HigheT Education, pp.457-473, 2003.

D. J. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-dick, Formative assessment and self-regulated lea.rning : a mode! and seven principles of good feedback practice, pp.31199-218, 2006.

C. Ricketts and S. Vvilks, Improving student performance through computer-based assessment : insights from recent research. Assessment ?1 e11aluation in higheT education, pp.475-479, 2002.

F. Silvestre, P. Vidal, and J. Broisin, Tsaap-Notes -- An Open Micro-blogging Tool for Collaborative Notetaking during Face-to-Face Lectures, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2014.
DOI : 10.1109/ICALT.2014.22
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01147226

M. Uhari, M. Renko, and H. Soini, Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures, BMC Medical Education, vol.28, issue.1, p.12, 2003.
DOI : 10.2190/EF68-J848-LAH1-N8QL