D. Black, The theory of committees and elections, 1958.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-4225-7

J. Blin and M. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and single-peakedness', Public Choice, pp.51-58, 1976.

M. Brill and V. Conitzer, Strategic voting and strategic candidacy, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.

J. Chamberlin, J. Cohen, and C. Coombs, Social Choice Observed: Five Presidential Elections of the American Psychological Association, The Journal of Politics, vol.46, issue.2, pp.479-502, 1984.
DOI : 10.2307/2130971

A. Cole, A strange affair: The 2002 presidential and parliamentary elections in france', Government and Opposition, pp.317-342, 2002.

F. Durand, Vers des modes de scrutin moins manipulables, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01242440

F. Durand, F. Mathieu, and L. Noirie, Reducing manipulability . Poster presented in the 5th International Workshop on, Computational Social Choice (COMSOC), 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01095992

P. Favardin and D. Lepelley, Some further results on the manipulability of social choice rules', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.485-509, 2006.

P. Favardin, D. Lepelley, and J. Serais, Borda rule, Copeland method and strategic manipulation, Review of Economic Design, vol.7, issue.2, pp.213-228, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/s100580200073
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00069522

P. Fristrup and H. Kleiding, A note on asymptotical strategy-proofness, Economics Letters, vol.31, issue.4, pp.307-312, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(89)90020-7

P. Fristrup and H. Kleiding, Erratum: A note on asymptotical strategy-proofness, Economics Letters, vol.105, issue.32, 1990.

A. Gibbard, Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result, Econometrica, vol.41, issue.4, pp.587-601, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/1914083

J. Green-armytage, Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections', Voting matters, pp.1-14, 2011.

J. Green-armytage, Strategic voting and nomination', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.111-138, 2014.

J. Green-armytage, N. Tideman, and R. Cosman, Statistical evaluation of voting rules', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.183-212, 2016.

H. Huang, C. Vincent, and . Chua, Analytical representation of probabilities under the IAC condition', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.143-155, 2000.

K. H. Kim and F. W. Roush, Statistical manipulability of social choice functions', Group Decision and Negotiation, pp.263-282, 1996.

D. Lepelley, A. Louichi, and H. Smaoui, On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.363-383, 2008.

D. Lepelley and B. Mbih, The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule, Economics Letters, vol.24, issue.4, pp.311-315, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90062-0

D. Lepelley and B. Mbih, The vulnerability of four social choice functions to coalitional manipulation of preferences', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.253-265, 1994.

D. Lepelley and F. Valognes, On the Kim and Roush voting procedure', Group Decision and Negotiation, pp.109-123, 1999.

D. Lepelley and F. Valognes, Voting rules, manipulability and social homogeneity', Public Choice, pp.165-184, 2003.

S. Nitzan, The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation', Public Choice, pp.349-370, 1985.

B. Peleg, A note on manipulability of large voting schemes, Theory and Decision, vol.46, issue.4, pp.401-412, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00139450

B. Peleg, Game theoretic analysis of voting in committees, number 7 in Econometric Society monographs in pure theory, 1984.

E. Penn, J. Patty, and S. Gailmard, Manipulation and Single-Peakedness: A General Result, American Journal of Political Science, vol.9, issue.1, pp.436-449, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00502.x

G. Pritchard and A. Slinko, On the average minimum size of a manipulating coalition', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.263-277, 2006.

G. Pritchard and M. Wilson, Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules', Social Choice and Welfare, pp.487-513, 2007.

R. Reyhani, G. Pritchard, and M. Wilson, A new measure of the difficulty of manipulation of voting rules, 2009.

D. Saari, Susceptibility to manipulation', Public Choice, pp.21-41, 1990.

M. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, issue.2, pp.187-217, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2

A. Slinko, On asymptotic strategy-proofness of classical social choice rules', Theory and Decision, pp.389-398, 2002.

A. Slinko, How large should a coalition be to manipulate an election?, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.47, issue.3, pp.289-293, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2003.09.007

D. Smith, Manipulability measures of common social choice functions' , Social Choice and Welfare, pp.639-661, 1999.

N. Tideman, Collective Decisions And Voting: The Potential for Public Choice, Ashgate, 2006.