J. Allwood, An activity-based approach to pragmatics, 1995.
DOI : 10.1075/nlp.1.02all

A. Anderson, M. Bader, E. Bard, E. Boyle, G. Doherty et al., e HCRC map task corpus, Language and Speech, vol.34, pp.351-366, 1991.

K. Anderson, E. André, T. Baur, S. Bernardini, M. Chollet et al., The TARDIS Framework: Intelligent Virtual Agents for Social Coaching in Job Interviews, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_35

J. L. Austin, How to Do ings With Words, 1962.

R. Beun, Declarative question acts: Two experiments on identiication, e structure of multimodal dialogues, 1989.

R. Beun, Context and form, Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue. Studies in Computational Pragmatics. John Benjamins, 2000.
DOI : 10.1075/nlp.1.09beu

P. Boersma and D. Weenink, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.51) [computer program]. retrieved 31, 2014.

H. Bunt, 7. Dynamic Interpretation and Dialogue Theory, Structure of Multimodal Dialogue, vol.2, pp.139-166, 2000.
DOI : 10.1075/z.99.10bun

H. Bunt, Multifunctionality in dialogue, Computer Speech & Language, vol.25, issue.2, pp.222-245, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.csl.2010.04.006
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692189

H. Bunt, J. Alexandersson, J. Choe, C. A. Fang, K. Hasida et al., ISO 24617-2: Semantically-based standard for dialogue annotation, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2012.

S. Campano, C. Clavel, and C. Pelachaud, I like this painting too: When an ECA shares appreciations to engage users, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp.1649-1650, 2015.

M. G. Core and J. F. Allen, Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme, 1997.

D. Carolis, B. Pelachaud, C. Poggi, I. Steedman, and M. , APML, a mark-up language for believable behavior generation, Life-like Characters. Tools, AAective Functions and Applications, pp.65-85, 2004.

A. Gravano, S. Benus, J. Hirschberg, S. G. Elisa, and G. Ward, e eeect of prosody and semantic modality on the assessment of speaker certainty, Proceedings of 4th Speech Prosody Conference, 2008.

J. Hirschberg, Pragmatics and intonatinon, 2004.

M. E. Hoque, M. S. Sorower, M. Yeasin, and M. M. Louwerse, What Speech Tells Us About Discourse: The Role of Prosodic and Discourse Features in Speech Act Classification, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp.2999-3004, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/IJCNN.2007.4371438

J. Klaa, S. Marsella, and N. Krämer, Negotiations in the context of AIDS prevention: An agent-based model using theory of mind, Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp.209-215, 2011.

P. Laukka, P. Juslin, and R. Bresin, A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion, Cognition & Emotion, vol.30, issue.5, pp.633-653, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151

G. Mckeown, M. Valstar, R. Cowie, M. Pantic, and M. Schröder, The SEMAINE Database: Annotated Multimodal Records of Emotionally Colored Conversations between a Person and a Limited Agent, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol.3, issue.1, pp.5-17, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.20

H. E. Palmer, English Intonation with Systematic Exercises, 1922.

J. Pierrehumbert, e Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation, 1980.

A. Popescu-belis, Dialogue act tagsets for meeting understanding: An abstraction based on the DAMSL, Switchboard and ICSI-MR tagsets, 2003.

M. Safárová, Rises and falls: Studies in the semantics and pragmatics of intonation, pp.59-74, 2006.

K. R. Scherer, Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms, Speech Communication, vol.40, issue.1-2, pp.227-256, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00084-5

J. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the eory of Speech Acts, 1979.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511609213

E. Shriberg, R. Bates, A. Stolcke, P. Taylor, D. Jurafsky et al., Can prosody aid the automatic classiication of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech (Special Issue on Prosody and Conversation, pp.41-44, 1998.

K. Silverman, M. Beckman, J. Pitrelli, M. Ostendorf, C. Wightman et al., ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp.867-870, 1992.

P. Suignard, Naviiest: un outil pour naviguer dans une base de questions poséesposées`poséesà un agent conversationnel, Workshop sur les Agents Conversationnels Animés, 2010.

A. Syrdal and Y. Kim, Dialog speech acts and prosody: Considerations for TTS, Proceedings of Speech Prosody, pp.661-665, 2008.

T. Yoon, R. Chavarría, J. Cole, and M. Hasegawa-johnson, Intertranscriber reliability of prosodic labeling on telephone conversation using ToBI, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp.2729-2732, 2004.