D. Stergos, V. Afantenos, and . Karkaletsis, Panagiotis Stamatopoulos, and Constantin Halatsis Using Synchronic and Diachronic Relations for Summarizing Multiple Documents Describing Evolving Events, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol.30, issue.3, pp.183-226, 2008.

S. Afantenos, N. Asher, F. Benamara, M. Bras, C. Fabre et al., An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organisation: the annodis corpus, Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair) Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12) European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00976087

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?, International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol.6, issue.3, pp.19-32, 2012.
DOI : 10.4018/jcini.2012070102

D. Apothéloz, Esquisse d'un catalogue des formes de la contre-argumentation, Travaux du Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques, pp.69-86, 1989.

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Logics of Conversation, Studies in Natural Language Processing, 2003.

N. Asher, A. Venant, P. Muller, and S. D. Afantenos, Complex discourse units and their semantics, Contstraints in Discourse, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00661427

E. Cabrio and S. Villata, Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions, Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.208-212, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00724767

E. Cabrio and S. Villata, Natural Language Arguments: A Combined Approach, 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2012), 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00724780

D. Phan-minh, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, pp.321-357, 1995.

V. W. , F. , and G. Hirst, Classifying arguments by scheme, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.987-996, 2011.

J. Glazer and A. Rubinstein, On Optimal Rules of Persuasion, Econometrica, vol.72, issue.6, pp.1715-1736, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00551.x

C. William, S. A. Mann, and . Thompson, Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organization, Text, vol.8, issue.3, pp.243-281, 1988.

P. Muller, S. Afantenos, P. Denis, and N. Asher, Constrained decoding for text-level discourse parsing, Proceedings of COL- ING 2012 The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, pp.1883-1900, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00750611

R. Mochales, P. , and M. Moens, Argumentation mining, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '09, pp.98-107, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s10506-010-9104-x

A. Peldszus and M. Stede, From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts:, International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol.7, issue.1, pp.1-31, 2013.
DOI : 10.4018/jcini.2013010101

S. Teufel and M. Moens, Summarizing Scientific Articles: Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status, Computational Linguistics, vol.20, issue.2, pp.409-445, 2002.
DOI : 10.1038/224318a0

S. Teufel, Argumentative Zoning: Information Extraction from Scientific Articles, 1999.

D. Walton, C. Reed, and F. Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, 2008.